Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world
Do you think this is a positive or negative development?
Countries in the world are becoming more interdependent. We exchange our goods with other countries and vice versa. As a result, same goods are purchased everywhere. Many people consider this as a positive development; others, however, claim this is a negative trend.
First and foremost, good exchanges enables consumers to buy product with high quality everywhere. People from developing countries have the chance to use good products and have access to more modern technology from more developed countries and world's super power. Furthermore, to some certain extent, this also means cultural exchange among countries. You can find a shop selling kimono Japanese's traditional garment from other parts of Asia. The chance to get better grasp of other countries in or outside our cultural sphere is increased, and so does the bond among nations.
A related criticism, however, is that buying the same products everywhere has a negative impact on domestic trade. For example, in Vietnam-a developing and trade surplus country, people can buy durable and high-quality items from Japan, South Korea, Europe... within walking distance. We get so used to it that it is hard for most of us to buy and accept lower-quality products from Vietnamese companies. Due to this, domestic products do not have chance to develop and companies do not raise enough funds to launch better version of the same said products.
Having said that, this also means companies have to put more effort in producing goods that meet consumer's need. In exchange, consumers will be introduced with a wider selection of items to choose from. In the long run, consumers are the ones who gain benefit, so as an individual, I find this a positive development.
Overall, that countries are becoming similar to each other seems an inevitable stage in the development of society. This challenges companies to produce things that bring satisfaction to consumers worldwide, thus making society more developed.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-08 | Hà Gia Bảo | 73 | view |
| 2019-05-29 | Camellia Farm | 78 | view |
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free.Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages? 73
- Some people say that the only reason for learning a foreign language is in order to travel to or work in a foreign country. Others say that these are not the only reasons why someone should learn a foreign language.Discuss both these views and give your 84
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology.In what ways has tech affected the types of relationship people make?Has this become a positive or negative development? 78
- Every year several languages die out. Some people think that this is not important because life will be easier if there are fewer languages in the world.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 84
- Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the worldDo you think this is a positive or negative development? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 294, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...enefit, so as an individual, I find this a positive development. Overall, that...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, however, so, thus, for example, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1666.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28888888889 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8076668601 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577777777778 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 521.1 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.6848315425 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.6842105263 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5789473684 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.63157894737 7.06120827912 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.324144993856 0.244688304435 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0910852089476 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.072870475636 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179705283237 0.151304729494 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0552256320867 0.056905535591 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.