Countries with a long average working time are more economically successful than those countries which do not have a long working time. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In today's ever-changing world, a well-established fact shows that lengthening average work duration can generate economic success, compared to countries with short working time. I tend to completely disagree with this opinion after considering underlying reasons such as employees’ health as well as the employment of technological achievements.
To begin with, an extended work schedule does not necessarily improve productivity, yet it seems rather detrimental to workers’ well-being. To elaborate, due to heavy workload, employees are unlikely to have the ideal work-life balance, thereby being morally undermined, which subsequently deteriorates their health. Salient examples can be seen with emerging problems such as fatigue, work stress and depression. This, explicitly, can hold back economic success.
Another convincing point is that economic levels are not associated with work duration. Notably, it is the efficient usage of advanced technology that has a tight relationship with public financial assets. To put it simply, the effective application of technological and scientific achievements can generate a productive work environment, therefore, it enhances enterprises’ profits, which contribute to the overall nation’ financial ratings. An example to illustrate this point is the Silicon Valley: although workers do not have an exact work schedule and they can work whenever they want, which seems rather lacking in discipline, the outcomes of their work cannot be underestimated, all thanks to the triumphant adoption of technology.
To recapitulate, business hours have no impact on economic ratings, given that adding working time can weaken workers’ well-being, and the technological appliances are more valuable instead.
- Many animal species in the world are becoming extinct nowadays Some people say that countries and individuals should protect these animals from dying out while others say we should concentrate more on the problems of human beings Discuss both views and gi 78
- Countries with a long average working time are more economically successful than those countries which do not have a long working time To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Developments in science and technology have caused environmental problems Some people think that a simpler way of life will protect the environment while others believe that science and technology can solve environmental problems Discuss both views and gi 89
- Some people think that language should be taught in small classes while other people think the number of students in a language class does not matter Discuss both views and give your opinion 56
- Some people think that environmental problems are too big for individuals to solve Others however believe that these problems cannot be solved if individuals do not take actions Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 742, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the triumphant adoption of technology. To recapitulate, business hours have no ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, then, therefore, well, such as, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1510.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 251.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.01593625498 5.12529762239 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.30631206888 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.665338645418 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 460.8 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.7331907115 49.4020404114 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.272727273 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8181818182 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.36363636364 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.285090745061 0.244688304435 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10303916777 0.084324248473 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.066085556503 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173729363846 0.151304729494 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0328117989484 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.3 13.0946893788 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.93 12.4159519038 144% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.77 8.58950901804 125% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.