A country becomes more interesting and develops more quickly when its population includes a mixture nationalities. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this?
The evolutionary process and becoming exciting of a country depend on extent of the acceptance to the global civilization. It promotes the development of the country and becomes a virtual factor in the diversity culture. I totally agree with this one and in my essay, I will clarify the opinion with relevant examples.
First of all, the government each country should consider that learning the good culture is a great way to improve their various parts. It is necessary to know about different cultures around the world. In other words, A country with a variety in life style will attract visitors and contribute to development of country. Furthermore, approaching to advanced technology in the world gets a dominant position in the increasing economic. For instance, Japan is a typical country which includes mixture nationalities. Population in this country has a high intellectual and good awareness about exception of the global knowledge. As a result, because of this position of strength, Japan takes great progress in economic growth for many decades and keep up. Thus, learning about cultural values, progress education and advanced technology becomes more and more important, especially in the developing countries.
However, besides the goodness, it still has drawbacks that is losing traditional in some countries. Every country has their own cultural exchanges way. Even though they should mix nationalities, but it will be harmful if this is abused. Nevertheless, each country should build their own special things by alternative values and some other from the world.
In the including, the national mixture is a great way for development of countries. The nation which wants to get achievements from this should make a suitable direction to avoid mistakes needless.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, furthermore, however, if, nevertheless, so, still, thus, for instance, as a result, first of all, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1510.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37366548043 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96253032212 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.565836298932 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 466.2 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.9986850865 49.4020404114 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 88.8235294118 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5294117647 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.82352941176 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245381370109 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0713640952071 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0560282731048 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134742785551 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0693764541267 0.056905535591 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.57 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.