Demand for food is increasing worldwide What are the causes of this What measures can the international community take to make sure the supply of food is enough

Essay topics:

Demand for food is increasing worldwide. What are the causes of this? What measures can
the international community take to make sure the supply of food is enough?

Substance demand is growing rapidly. And this is the result of many factors. In this essay, I will explain about those factors and how to solve them.

Unplanned reproductive families are one of the main causes of this problem in many countries. They believe that the more children, the greater the happiness. And in the future, when they get old, they will have someone to care for. In some countries with low education levels, women are believed to be only responsible for birth. So they have to do that very well. Despite this, the solution to this problem only needs to raise people's intellectual level and widely propagate the family planning program. For instance, in Vietnam, young families limit the birth of a second or third child, so the population is very stable now.

Secondly, green foods are more popular because everyone wants to protect their health, and the way households choose food has also become stricter since the past few years. However, many companies still choose the old production method. So the solution is that the state and the government should disseminate to companies the methods of producing green foods. For example, the Minh Duong company, because it applies green food methods, has been imported and trusted by many countries.

In conclusion, the need for food is increasing due to population growth and food quality is increasingly demanded. To solve this problem, it is necessary to introduce laws on family planning and provide subsidies. For companies about green food production.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-08-02 TLan168 73 view
2023-07-30 TLan168 56 view
2023-07-30 TLan168 61 view
2023-07-30 TLan168 67 view
2023-07-30 TLan168 78 view
Essays by user TLan168 :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, second, secondly, so, still, third, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1281.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 251.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10358565737 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58190078187 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.609561752988 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 388.8 506.74238477 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.1168067137 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.3529411765 106.682146367 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.7647058824 20.7667163134 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.70588235294 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184901864868 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0566464963044 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0586485973867 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118643254108 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0666613734226 0.056905535591 117% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.0946893788 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 50.2224549098 131% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.3001002004 67% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.71 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 9.78957915832 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, second, secondly, so, still, third, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1281.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 251.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10358565737 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58190078187 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.609561752988 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 388.8 506.74238477 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.1168067137 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.3529411765 106.682146367 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.7647058824 20.7667163134 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.70588235294 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184901864868 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0566464963044 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0586485973867 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118643254108 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0666613734226 0.056905535591 117% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.0946893788 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 50.2224549098 131% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.3001002004 67% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.71 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 9.78957915832 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.