In the future all cars, buses and trucks will be driverless. The only people travelling inside these vehicles will be passengers. Do you think the advantages of driverless vehicles outweigh the disadvantages?
It is perceived by many that in the future all vehicles such as cars, buses as well as trucks will not need a driver. These vehicles will be conducted by a system while only passengers will only human beings in those vehicles. This essay will analyse both merits and demerits of the issues along with my point of view. In my opinion, I’m convinced that the advantages of driveless vehicles do not outweigh the disadvantages.
Concerning the positiveness of the problem, it’s pivotal to mention the main advantage is saving working labours. Indeed, when we operate trucks, buses or cars with technology, we can have extra workforce for other jobs which need human skills. For instance, a person who is a driver will work in other fields in the future which need his communication skills like receptionist or doing surveys. In other words, human will concentrate on sectors which need human like doing research or something like that.
Concerning the negative side of driverless vehicle, I believe that I prefer a vehicle which is driven by a diver. Indeed, I cannot trust a machine or technology to hold my safety. For example, if I take a taxi, I will choose a taxi which has a driver who is a human because I believe no technology cab replace humankind. Undoubtedly, the risk for an accident happens is pretty high a vehicle is controlled by a robot or a system. On the other hand, a large amount of drivers have to change their jobs. It would be hard for them because they might not find another job which is suitable their educational background while their main skills are driving. As a result, they maybe become jobless and that will influence on economy of the country.
In conclusion, there are some pros and cons if vehicle become driveless. From my point of view, I have a strong believe that the merits do not outweigh the demerits because technology or robots cannot replace humankind.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-10 | brew | 73 | view |
| 2024-08-09 | brew | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-28 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-26 | aliceali | 56 | view |
| 2023-06-20 | butterflyluo | 73 | view |
- The chart below gives information about how families in one country spent their weekly income in 1968 and in 2018 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 73
- The charts below show the percentage of water used by different sectors in Sydney Australia in 1997 and 2007 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The charts below show the percentage of water used by different sectors in Sydney Australia in 1997 and 2007 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Because computers can translate all languages very quickly and accurately learning a foreign language is a waste of time To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 113, Rule ID: BELIEVE_BELIEF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'belief' (noun) instead of believe (verb)?
Suggestion: belief
... From my point of view, I have a strong believe that the merits do not outweigh the dem...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, so, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, in my opinion, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1582.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 330.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79393939394 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66152396674 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542424242424 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 499.5 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 5.43587174349 221% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.1240055853 49.4020404114 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 93.0588235294 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4117647059 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.82352941176 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.290694459834 0.244688304435 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0884017075967 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.094171245778 0.0667982634062 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178164112537 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.144489191595 0.056905535591 254% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.