Government investment in the arts, such as music and theatre, is a waste of money. Governments must invest this money in public services instead.
To what extent do you agree with this statement?
Government’s funding has been a topic of hot debate. Some people believe that spending money in the entertainment sectors such as, arts and theatres is a waste of government revenues because of social and environmental factors. Nonetheless, in my opinion, it’s completely justified that, investing on public services is extremely positive due to multiple reasons.
There are many reasons as to why investment in public services such as, health and education can be beneficial for the mankind. That is because, public servants do job that have positive impact on every member of the society. Finding for health and education research help to find complete cure for chronic diseases, such as diabetes and cancer. Also, citizens use schools, hospitals and they need the security that the police provides. Therefore, if analysed properly, there is no argument to the fact that , the majority of people could be lifted out of poverty and given better quality of life, if the government reallocated the money spent on arts.
Another reason stems from the fact that, development of public transportation has a positive impact on environment. Increase public transit can help decrease air pollution by reducing greenhouse gas emissions. For example, Improving networks system , such as maintenance of the roads, building new motorways, and underground trains and Metrolink , help to decrease congestion in the traffic and reduce carbon dioxide emissions by cars. Based on these reasons, it is not a far-fetched conclusion to say that , improving public transportation are environmental friendly.
In conclusion, investment by the government in various sectors is a burning topic. Many believe that arts should be the sector getting all resources from the party. Nevertheless, I stand firm by my opinion that, government should spend money on services that benefit all members of society.
- Government investment in the arts, such as music and theatre, is a waste of money. Governments must invest this money in public services instead.To what extent do you agree with this statement? 67
- Government investment in the arts, such as music and theatre, is a waste of money. Governments must invest this money in public services instead.To what extent do you agree with this statement. 61
- Overpopulation is a major problem in many urban centres around the world. What problems does this cause? How can we solve the issue of overpopulation? 89
- Some people think that libraries are a waste of resources and money so computer should replace them. However, others do not agree . Discuss both sides and give your opinion. 78
- some people think that money is one of the most essential factors in promoting happiness.Do you think people can be happy without much money?What other factors contribute towards happiness? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 508, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...y, there is no argument to the fact that , the majority of people could be lifted ...
^^
Line 9, column 249, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
.... For example, Improving networks system , such as maintenance of the roads, build...
^^
Line 9, column 346, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ys, and underground trains and Metrolink , help to decrease congestion in the traf...
^^
Line 9, column 507, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...not a far-fetched conclusion to say that , improving public transportation are env...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, nevertheless, nonetheless, so, therefore, as to, for example, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1614.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.50853242321 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04062216071 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597269624573 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 493.2 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.4445188729 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.6 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5333333333 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.26666666667 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213670744969 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0670055119366 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.052937470458 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131270146269 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0552826006503 0.056905535591 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.75 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.