Government should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Developing transportation is an essential policy of all countries to promote the economy and connect different regions together. However, some people believe that more money should be invested in railways rather than roads. This statement is somehow reasonable, but in my opinion, road development will play an important role in tandem with the railways.
The investment in railways should be a crucial strategy, which will bring a lot of benefits for both society and the economy. There are many reasons which account for this idea, firstly, the national railways can connect every area within a country easier than highways, which partly depend on the geographical structure. In addition, the number of commodities, as well as passengers conveyed by train is larger, the speed and the guarantee are also higher because of using separate ways. If the government spurs the development of the railway, less of the budget will be allocated for construction.
In contrast to that idea, paralleling the means of train delivery, constructing highways has a special role. Traveling on the road is more convenient for short distances, especially the highway which can link the rural with urban better than railways. Moreover, in emergencies, for example, the plane can not land at the right airport, highways become an alternative line for landing. For some reason, people can build higher roads with the aim of avoiding isolation during the rainy season, when floods come.
In conclusion, promoting both railways and roads will bring more than double-positive effects on society improvement, therefore, we would better balance the investment on those kinds of transportation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-04 | Ahmad_off | 73 | view |
| 2024-08-04 | Ahmad_off | 56 | view |
| 2024-05-27 | thaokim2003 | 78 | view |
| 2024-04-25 | trpg143 | 78 | view |
| 2024-02-22 | Wardiati Yusuf | 73 | view |
- The first chart below gives information about the money spent by British parents on their children sports between 2008 and 2014. The second chart shows the number of children who participated in three sports i Britain over the same time period. 61
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages 78
- The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015 78
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which maybe unhealthy if eaten too much Summarise the main information by reporting and selecting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The three pie charts below shows the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981 1991 and 2001 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, as well as, in contrast to, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 24.0651302605 29% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1415.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 262.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40076335878 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92563911926 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.62213740458 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 424.8 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.8890219703 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.916666667 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8333333333 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.8333333333 7.06120827912 196% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186065899083 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0674029433573 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0602090720043 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113638800639 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0509879590557 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.