Governments should support care and finance for retired people while others believe that they should save money when they get older. Discuss both views and give your opinion?
Nowadays, many debates in the community have argued about how retired manage to live when they are in great need of care and financial support. While some arguments say that the government should aid basic necessities about healthcare and finances for retirees, others claim that they should save their own money during younger years to use comfortably when they become older. In my opinion, I accept that government should look after and financially support for retirees but I also believe that they should have their own savings to be a master of our life without having to depend completely on anyone else.
On the one hand, It is important to acknowledge that no one does not contribute to the accelerating development of society, especially retired citizen. Particularly, from the economic perspective, the national budget is enriched by paying for compulsory taxes from mainly wealthy people. Additionally, others spend money on commodities and services, which allows businesses to earn profits and pay taxes as well. Obviously, such taxes are used by authorities to develop the country, such as by building hospitals or constructing skyscrapers, and pay for officials like police officers and politicians. As a way of compensation for their devotion in their youth, the government ought to offer the elderly money-related assistance and care services, for example, regular free-of-charge health checkups.
On the other hand, the national budget cannot suffice to pay for everything each citizen needs in their life. It means that however wealthy a country can be, the governmental support just aims to reduce a part of medical and financial burdens for retirees and they must manage to meet the personal requirements and expenses by their own savings. Saving money can help retired people achieve their goals, such as owning a dream house or having stable accommodation for their children. Moreover, without a sum of savings, they would face a lot of difficulties when they need to afford entertainment or new fashion items. Finally, it is not advisable for the government to spend excessive amounts of money on public welfare as this will harm the budget used to solve pressing social issues such as environmental pollution or the housing crisis.
In conclusion, saving certain amounts of money plays an important role in satisfying the demands of retirees and helping them to stay financially independent, but they must be assisted healthcare and money related aid from the government.
- Nowadays celebrities earn more money than politicians What are the reasons for this Is it a positive or negative development 56
- Governments should support care and finance for retired people while others believe that they should save money when they get older Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- The way people live has changed significantly Some say that it is a negative trend Do you agree or disagree 84
- Some people think that instead of preventing climate change we need to find a way to live with it To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Nowadays celebrities earn more money than politicians What are the reasons for this Is it a positive or negative development 56
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 201, Rule ID: BASIC_FUNDAMENTALS[1]
Message: Use simply 'necessities'.
Suggestion: necessities
...ents say that the government should aid basic necessities about healthcare and finances for retir...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, however, if, look, moreover, so, well, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2099.0 1615.20841683 130% => OK
No of words: 399.0 315.596192385 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26065162907 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46933824581 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91480097489 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 176.041082164 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568922305764 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 653.4 506.74238477 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 46.44505202 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.928571429 106.682146367 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.5 20.7667163134 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.64285714286 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.340803962005 0.244688304435 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108164326731 0.084324248473 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0925295103594 0.0667982634062 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198566696821 0.151304729494 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.13493219061 0.056905535591 237% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 50.2224549098 86% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 9.78957915832 189% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 201, Rule ID: BASIC_FUNDAMENTALS[1]
Message: Use simply 'necessities'.
Suggestion: necessities
...ents say that the government should aid basic necessities about healthcare and finances for retir...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, however, if, look, moreover, so, well, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2099.0 1615.20841683 130% => OK
No of words: 399.0 315.596192385 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26065162907 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46933824581 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91480097489 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 176.041082164 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568922305764 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 653.4 506.74238477 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 46.44505202 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.928571429 106.682146367 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.5 20.7667163134 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.64285714286 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.340803962005 0.244688304435 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108164326731 0.084324248473 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0925295103594 0.0667982634062 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198566696821 0.151304729494 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.13493219061 0.056905535591 237% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 50.2224549098 86% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 9.78957915832 189% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.