Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems. To what extend do you agree or disagree? What other measures do you think might be effective?
It is certainly true that the issues related to environmental pollution have become one of the most controversial issues today, and every nation is wondering about how to tackle the problem. A chunk of individuals opines that due to increasing petrol price, it would be reduced traffic congestion and pollution. I am not completely agree with this statement because other factor are important to traffic and pollution problem. This essay will be analyzed with assisting evidence.
To begin with, some people believe that vehicle is mainly depended on price of fuel. First of all, due to increasing price, many middle class and poor people do not spend more money in fuel as consequence they prefer to travel by public transport rather than personal vehicle in long distance. Recently, Times of India carried a survey in city of Delhi and concluded that last year almost 40% people used public transport as metro, railway, city bus from own personal vehicle due to hiking prices of fuels. Moreover, today's world many people have chosen to travel by bicycle in short distance because, it does not damage to any pollution and they needed small area for park. Recently, transport department of Gujarat carried a survey of how many vehicles was sold in last year and informed that bicycle selling rate was drastically increased by almost 30% in 2020 compared with 2019. Overall, many people changed their travel pattern from personal vehicle to public transport for long distance as well as bicycle for shorter distance.
On the other hand, if high taxes should be imposed by government on private vehicle as a result many people will not afford to buy a new vehicle, which can help to reduce traffic problem and pollution. Apart from this, government should apply new traffic rules as odd even formula. This formula depends on vehicle's number total, if they sum is odd, then they will move 3 days in week, whereas other days are moved by even sum vehicle.
In recapitulation, I believe that increasing price of fuel citizen can change their daily travel routing and prefer to public transport and bicycle. However, problem of traffic and pollution which also reduced by increase of taxes on new vehicle and apply new odd even formula.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-22 | lilyngan | 89 | view |
| 2021-12-14 | Hoang Mung | 73 | view |
| 2021-10-22 | dattu.vp79@gmail.com | 73 | view |
| 2021-10-22 | dattu.vp79@gmail.com | 73 | view |
| 2021-10-22 | dattu.vp79@gmail.com | 73 | view |
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems To what extend do you agree or disagree What other measures do you think might be effective 73
- Many claim that the fast food industry had a negative effect on the environment eating habits and families To what extent do you agree or disagree 62
- The chart below shows the amount spend on six consumer goods in four European countries
- Technology is becoming increasingly prevalent in the world today Given time technology will completely replace the teacher in the classroom Do you agree or disagree with this statement 78
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems To what extend do you agree or disagree What other measures do you think might be effective 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, moreover, so, then, well, whereas, apart from, in short, as a result, as well as, first of all, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1860.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 374.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97326203209 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3976220399 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48595816324 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532085561497 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 583.2 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.4366485739 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.0 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9333333333 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2666666667 7.06120827912 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133527663485 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0526126291094 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0445032669595 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0943354411786 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.046851235641 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, moreover, so, then, well, whereas, apart from, in short, as a result, as well as, first of all, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1860.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 374.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97326203209 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3976220399 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48595816324 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532085561497 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 583.2 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.4366485739 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.0 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9333333333 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2666666667 7.06120827912 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133527663485 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0526126291094 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0445032669595 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0943354411786 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.046851235641 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.