Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree? What other measures do you think might be effective.
The bombardment advent over the half century of vehicles had, in its cumulative effect, put humans in predicament resorting to the unflagging alert metropolises issues; as such of traffic jams and high levels of pollution. As an initial suggestion, the rise in petrol prices is thought to effectively bring about the stranglehold obstructing unwanted consequences. From my perspective, I ally to opposition of this suggestion by the demonstration as follow:
In the mirror of reality, the off-chance of governments opting to this resolution is not immoderately rare. To begin with, the overcharging of petrol prices ought to lay a harmful foundation on the industry. Oil and gas serve as the essence of market commodities and fuel necessities in the production; as to officiating machinery are to operate by petrol to function in factories. Therefore, many small entrepreneurs may find it oddly compilable to run their businesses. Additionally, excessive prices of petrol indirectly hook over the costs of various goods in the markets as an inter-twining link with the higher costs of transportation. consequently, this puts financial strain on the low and middle classes.
On the other hand, there are some ideal solutions to traffic and pollution problems in cities. First and foremost, improving means of public transport can spark residents' interest in opting for more usage instead of private cars. The trend will result in a decreasing pool of traffic congestion and road accidents. Furthermore, the application of other clean sources of energy like solar, wind, and biology should be in place widely to replace fossil fuels.
All in all, traffic jams and pollution are becoming worse and worse. So, it is both governments' and residents' responsibility to join hands to sort these problems out, and our awareness truly counts towards this process.
- Some people think that it is necessary to travel abroad to learn about other countries, but other people think that it is not necessary to travel abroad because all the information can be seen at TV and the internet. Discuss both opinions and give your ow 89
- Parents and teachers make many rules for the children to encourage good behavior and protect them from danger. However, children would benefit from few rules and greater freedom.To what extent do you agree or disagree. 56
- Some people believe that schools should only teach children subjects which are beneficial to their future career and therefore others subjects such as music and sports are not important Agree or disagree 31
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems To what extent do you agree or disagree What other measures do you think might be effective 84
- The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six-month period in 2011. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 289, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the rise in petrol prices is thought to effectively bring about the stranglehold...
^^
Line 1, column 450, Rule ID: AS_FOLLOW[1]
Message: Did you mean 'as follows'?
Suggestion: as follows
...of this suggestion by the demonstration as follow: In the mirror of reality, the off-...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 460, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ggestion by the demonstration as follow: In the mirror of reality, the off-chance...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 643, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Consequently
...ith the higher costs of transportation. consequently, this puts financial strain on the low ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, furthermore, may, so, therefore, as to, in fact, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 7.30460921844 0% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1577.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38225255973 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16395690611 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.648464163823 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 483.3 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.3297701543 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.642857143 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9285714286 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.28571428571 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124790089017 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0390974595322 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0377041017603 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.067009961947 0.151304729494 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0167409660912 0.056905535591 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.59 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.