Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.
To what extent do you agree or disagree? What other measures do you think might be effective?
Increasing the cost of petrol is said to be the best solution to reduce the growth of transportations and contamination issues. As far as I am concerned, I hold the same opinion on this statement due to the benefits it brings; however, there are more answers for this issue.
Expanding petrol’s payment may upset people with financial problems; however, it will boost the development of society in some cases such as traffic and the atmosphere. Starting with traffic, it can be seen clearly that the traffic system is now becoming chaotic due to the growth of vehicles. Therefore, augmenting petrol’s price may make people divert to public transports or environmental vehicles such as bus, bicycles. From that consequence, the lesser the vehicle is, the lesser the co2 emission is. Which can avoid the hazard of greenhouse effect and global warming.
To come up with other solutions for this issue, the governments should offer more public transports for each type of person such as students, elder, and occupied employers due to the separated schedule. Hence, people can freely choose which transportation suits them best. As evidence, Germany has arranged different types of metro with different prices and they also have a metro for people with dogs only. To come up with more creative ideas, we can also program an app to stimulate people to walk more. They will receive money or gifts after finishing a required length of paths.
It is argued that boosting the cost of petrol is the most suitable solution for vehicle reduction and environmental development. From my point of view, I have come to the same conclusion.
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 84
- The pie charts show the destination of export goods in three countries in 2010
- The chart below shows the annual pay thousands of US dollars for doctors and other workers in seven countries in 2004 73
- Some people believe that children should spend all of their free time with their families Others believe that this is unnecessary or even negative Discuss the possible arguments on both sides and say which side you personally support 73
- 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, however, if, may, so, therefore, such as, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1362.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04444444444 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78617003864 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.596296296296 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 414.9 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.7395911334 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.2857142857 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2857142857 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.85714285714 7.06120827912 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0795528335939 0.244688304435 33% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0293527272049 0.084324248473 35% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0327858920288 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0497626381879 0.151304729494 33% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0274437106043 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.