Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment; only governments and large companies can make a difference. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Many people believe that political figures take responsibility for ecological conservation, not civilians as civilians' act has minor effects on the ecosystem. I agree that environmental protection is the responsibility of politicians, but individuals are also the people of Earth, and maintaining the green color of the planet is their unquestionable duty.
The main reason why I believe biosphere protection is the politicians' responsibility is that political figures are influential people. With their power and wealthiness, politicians could certainly create various environmental campaigns. They should vicariously provide citizens with valuable ecological knowledge through mass media, which could improve people's cognition on how to protect the planet. Furthermore, they should spend their money on financing environmental projects and starting a scholarship fund, which will then award students who create advanced technology gadgets to improve mother nature’s health.
In addition, environmental sustainability is practically also individuals' duty. The formers had said: “ Together we can change the world”, a person can not protect the ecosystem himself but everyone can. People should have appropriate actions toward mother nature. For instance, they should reduce littering, find a replacement for nylon bags, start using public transport more regularly to lessen the amount of emission, and strengthen environmental knowledge. While an individual could hardly create big changes immediately, the combined efforts of everyone on Earth would do, which outweigh the power of politicians who make up a minority of the population. Therefore, individuals undoubtedly have beneficial impacts on protecting the biosphere.
In conclusion, both politicians and civilians should take responsibility for sustaining the environment, and they should take prompt action as our ecosystem is gradually being deteriorated.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-28 | MinyiChu | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-12 | Đặng Ngọc Thanh Nhàn | 56 | view |
| 2023-05-31 | Guiseppe59192 | 67 | view |
| 2023-05-26 | Detonate | 11 | view |
| 2023-05-19 | hieu13092006 | 73 | view |
- The government should spend more money on medical research to protect citizens health rather than on protecting the environment Do you agree or disagree 78
- The tables give information about the temperatures and hours of daylight in London and Sydney during the same weekend in December 2018 77
- Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment only governments and large companies can make a difference To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Some educationalists say that every child should be taught how to play a musical instrument To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 59, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'politicians'' or 'politician's'?
Suggestion: politicians'; politician's
...y I believe biosphere protection is the politicians responsibility is that political figure...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, so, then, therefore, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 41.998997996 55% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1661.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.12915129151 5.12529762239 120% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.32220971371 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619926199262 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 510.3 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.5057264314 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.769230769 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8461538462 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.07692307692 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0945072887922 0.244688304435 39% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0338387902584 0.084324248473 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0464975680859 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0500583956596 0.151304729494 33% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.054660292706 0.056905535591 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 13.0946893788 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.8 50.2224549098 51% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.27 12.4159519038 147% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.7 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.