International tourism has brought enormous benefits to many places. At the same time, there is concern about its impact on local inhabitants and the environment.
Do the disadvantages of international tourism outweigh the advantages?
Nowadays, global travel is increasingly becoming affordable, which has driven the thrive in the tourism industry in many parts of the world. While tourism proves many positive aspects, some believe that it negatively influences local communities and the environment. In my opinion, the good sides will overshadow the disadvantageous ones.
On the one hand, the downsides of international travel can be varied. In terms of the environment in the host country, the growing demand for tourism means that there will be more shelters and accommodations that need to be built to accommodate a large number of holidaymakers. Thus, the vast majority of lands and trees will be cut down to serve the purpose, and therefore, there would be a loss in wildlife species and natural inhabitants. In addition, the amount of rubbish illegally dumped into the surroundings would eventually result in a rising in the levels of pollution and significantly damage the environment of the host country.
On the other hand, despite the negative sides of tourism mentioned above, it seems to me that the advantages are far more significant. Firstly, increased demand from tourists can boost local economies and local businesses since more tourists spend their budget on luxury services provided by local business owners. In Viet Nam, for example, tourism makes up a significant proportion of the national income; thus, local people mainly rely on the tourist trade and the influx of holidaymakers to make their fortune. Secondly, it can also bring investment opportunities from wealthy foreign investors who contribute massively to the economy's progress. In addition, job opportunities will surge as more tourists visit local areas, which will help reduce the underemployment rate. Lastly, the host country will have the chance to showcase and maintain its unique image to the world through the large numbers of people flooding into the country learning about its cultural heritage and customs.
In conclusion, it appears to me that the drawbacks of international tourism are far more eclipsed by the benefits.
- In some countries some criminal trials in law courts are shown on television so that the general public can watch Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 89
- In many countries schools have severe problems with students these days What are the causes of this issue What solutions would you suggest to tackle this problem 84
- Some people think that all college students should study whatever they like Others believe they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future such as those related to science and technology Discuss both of these views and give 84
- The graph shows children by age group as a percentage of the young population in the United Kingdom between 1990 and 2001 78
- Studying with a group of students in a classroom is more beneficial than learning online at home To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 79, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...y becoming affordable, which has driven the thrive in the tourism industry in many parts o...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 246, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...ns that need to be built to accommodate a large number of holidaymakers. Thus, the vast majority ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, lastly, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1768.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 330.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35757575758 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98238477002 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578787878788 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 557.1 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.1645517491 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.285714286 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5714285714 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.2857142857 7.06120827912 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17725429265 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0590807046004 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0398242637932 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113979649306 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0313753969304 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.85 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.