The internet means people do not need to travel to foreign countries to understand how others live.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Tourism has been regarded as an unprecedented human movement. While it is frequently argued that internet has helped people experience different places around the world virtually, one cannot ignore how travelling itself can improve both people and their countries. In this essay, the positive impacts of travelling on individual’s life will be discussed.
One of the main beneficial effects of travelling is communication. Not only does traveling expand one’s awareness and make them more attentive to the new world, but it can help people improve their personalities. When one is visiting a new country, that person is supposed to have a brief knowledge of their customs, traditions and lifestyles. So, by comparing them to their homelands’, travelers can find the beauty of any culture and get rid of clichés and replace the old habits with the better ones. Doing it helps people to boost their characters and becomes more openminded and tolerant. Moreover, it can bridge the cultural gaps between nations.
Through communicating, people would be able to improve their social and communication skills; especially when one uses their skills in order to be led somewhere or to earn something; it will guide them to improve their knowledge and to be aware of their surroundings. In other words, by mastering communication skills, people would be able to listen carefully and embrace different points of views. for example when I was in England more than half of the students were international students the only purpose of their family for sending them abroad was to improve their social skill and make them more independent.
Furthermore, travelling is thought to be trust-builder, as people can gain enough ability to feel another person’s pain and become more empathetic; hence, the trust bond between two different people can bring the healthy foundation for both people. Being way from one’s comfort enables people to make unfamiliar familiar, challenge assumptions and stereotypes that often color their view of people. Encountering and understanding another without having to accept everything they do always seeps into a kinder and less judgmental way of interacting with the other through the means of trusting to their good will and heart.
In conclusion, traveling not only leaves a Memento in people’s head but also boosts confidence and mainly improves communication and social skills which help people to resolve conflicts quickly.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-25 | phamquoctrung2007 | 89 | view |
| 2023-09-21 | Phuong1810 | 78 | view |
| 2023-09-21 | Phuong1810 | 78 | view |
| 2023-09-21 | Phuong1810 | 78 | view |
| 2023-09-21 | Phuong1810 | 78 | view |
- the number of train passangers travelling in Sydney
- The graph illustrates the number of new model cars produced from 2000 to 2002
- some people believe that nature is more important than nurture to what extent do you agree 56
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can serious social problems as well as practical problems To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
- Is prevention better than cure 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 356, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...on individual’s life will be discussed. One of the main beneficial effects of tr...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 400, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: For
... and embrace different points of views. for example when I was in England more than...
^^^
Line 7, column 625, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... trusting to their good will and heart. In conclusion, traveling not only leaves...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, if, moreover, so, while, as to, for example, in conclusion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 10.4138276553 202% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2087.0 1615.20841683 129% => OK
No of words: 387.0 315.596192385 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39276485788 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43534841618 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95048576747 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 176.041082164 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576227390181 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 625.5 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.9401954425 49.4020404114 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.4375 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1875 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5625 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131288208818 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0488861705237 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0433237213092 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0839320718629 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0325224196908 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.