It is generally believed that some people are born with certain talents, for instance for sport or music, and others are not. However, it is sometimes claimed any child can be taught to become a good sports person or musician.
Discuss both these views and give your opinion.
Whilst some believe that the quality of a child's performance in a subject indicates whether they are talented, I think that skills, such as a sport or music, are acquisitive, and dividing children into talented and untalented is not fair.
On the one hand, there is a conventional assumption that children are born with talents. This is because it is often observed that some children carry better performance at school than others, so their parents and teachers may conclude that he/she has a genuine talent. This statement stems from the fact that a certain child has not had any special training. Therefore, acting in an educated way indicates some kind of pure talent. For instance, a teacher astonished by a five-year-old understanding of music and rhyme implies an exceptional aptitude.
However, it is true that different skills can be fostered, and not everything is about talent. This proves that children learn about their abilities and how to improve them through education. This can be achieved by passionate, thoughtful teachers who put a great amount of effort into training their students. In my opinion, each skill requires a set of techniques to be done that can be acquired. Hence, grouping children into genius and ingenious is discriminative and offensive. For example, a child who was born into a wealthy family has various opportunities to learn about different subjects. In contrast, one might not be able to afford to provide all sorts of education for their child.
In conclusion, although some argue that people are born with certain gifts, I assume that it is dishonest to segregate gifted children from others as skills are attainable by accurate training and caring teachers.
It is important for children to learn the difference between right and wrong at an early age. Punishment is necessary to help them learn this distinction.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
What sort of punishment should parents and teachers be allowed to use to teach good behavior to children?
It is true that children should be warned about right and wrong from childhood. However, in my opinion, parents should avoid punishment since it may cause emotional harm to children, and in case of necessity, adults should carefully observe the language they are using to criticize their children.
In order to teach the younger ones to be thoughtful about their behavior, punishment is not essential and would be better dismissed. This is because punishments have a detrimental impact on a child's self-confidence. Generally, most of the means of correction include offensive language or physical attacks. As a result, they directly point at the child's dignity and pride. For instance, parents normally accuse their children of not being nice and honest when disobeying them. In addition, awards and prices are practical enough to make parents needless of blaming and punishing their kids. This stems from the fact that the younger ones usually tend to get praised and encouraged for behaving in an acceptable manner, and that is just sufficient to motivate them to avoid the wrong. A healthy rivalry at school could be taken as an example.
However, some may argue that occasionally, it is crucial to punish children for what they have done wrong. In this case, it is essential to consider the sort of punishment. To illustrate the point, adults can go on with verbal blaming rather than physical punishment, which is told in a lower voice, talking calmly about the specific subject and not generalizing. Parents who criticize their kids with gentle language in their privacy are proof of this. Accordingly, verbal punishment that is accurately done does not cause any harm to one's mental or physical health.
In conclusion, although any type of punishment is harmful to children and destroys their dignity, when choosing to criticize a child, parents should be aware of their language and avoid shouting or any kind of argument.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-05-26 | AnnaAlysia | 56 | view |
| 2024-05-03 | annaalysia007 | 56 | view |
| 2024-04-30 | Ahmad_off | 56 | view |
| 2023-09-04 | writingme | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-26 | Trinh Bella | 80 | view |
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems To what extend do you agree or disagree What other measures do you think might be effective 56
- the role of teachers in classroom 56
- Some people today believe that the world s increase in population is unsustainable and will eventually lead to a global crisis Other people believe that world population increase is necessary and beneficial as it creates the growth of the world s economy 73
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research business and the academic world Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely Discuss both these views and give 78
- the number of passengers travelling by train in sydney
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 378, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an educated way" with adverb for "educated"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...any special training. Therefore, acting in an educated way indicates some kind of pure talent. For...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 67, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...ould parents and teachers be allowed to use to teach good behavior to children? It...
^^^
Line 10, column 694, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an acceptable manner" with adverb for "acceptable"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...get praised and encouraged for behaving in an acceptable manner, and that is just sufficient to motivat...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, hence, however, if, may, so, therefore, for example, for instance, i think, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, kind of, sort of, such as, as a result, in my opinion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 40.0 13.1623246493 304% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 28.0 10.4138276553 269% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 22.0 7.30460921844 301% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 61.0 24.0651302605 253% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 89.0 41.998997996 212% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 22.0 8.3376753507 264% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3322.0 1615.20841683 206% => Less number of characters wanted.
No of words: 650.0 315.596192385 206% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11076923077 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.04926703274 4.20363070211 120% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79509291057 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 309.0 176.041082164 176% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.475384615385 0.561755894193 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1012.5 506.74238477 200% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 5.43587174349 258% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 11.0 4.76152304609 231% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 34.0 16.0721442886 212% => Too many sentences.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.7157421832 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.7058823529 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1176470588 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.73529411765 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 11.0 4.38176352705 251% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 17.0 3.9879759519 426% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179985921833 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0474326293386 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0364947132514 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0789614192964 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0432627189207 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 157.0 78.4519038076 200% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.