It is a good thing if senior management workers in a company get a much higher salary than other workers in the same company. Do you agree or disagree?
he salary of any employee is commensurate with their level of experience, workload, skills, and stress. The significantly higher salaries of top officials in organizations, compared to ordinary staff, have sparked much debate nowadays. Although there are some drawbacks to this discrepancy, I believe that the imbalance is justified to a certain extent.
One compelling argument in favor of higher salaries for top officials is the immense stress and responsibility they bear. Top officials are accountable for the overall performance of the organization, making their roles exceptionally demanding. If any employee makes a mistake, the top official is ultimately responsible and may face severe consequences even if they were unaware of the error. Therefore, it is reasonable that their salaries are much higher than those of ordinary workers.
Secondly, top officials have the obligation to fulfill the company's goals, which places an additional burden and stress on them. This responsibility requires a high level of expertise and dedication. Moreover, the prospect of achieving higher salaries can motivate general staff to improve their performance, aiming to reach these top positions and earn more. This motivation can lead to increased efficiency and productivity within the organization.
However, if the salary gap becomes excessively wide, it can lead to discontent among the general staff. Overpaying CEOs while underpaying workers can create a sense of unfairness and dissatisfaction, which may harm the overall morale and productivity of the firm. It is essential for companies to maintain a fair balance to prevent such negative outcomes.
To sum up, higher pay for top officials is justified due to their workload, stress, and responsibilities. However, organizations must ensure that this discrepancy remains fair and does not lead to an excessive imbalance. By maintaining a reasonable difference in salaries, companies can motivate all employees while preserving a sense of fairness and harmony.
- The video camera provides such an accurate and convincing record of contemporary life that it has become a more important form of documentation than written records 66
- The diagrams below show the categories of workforce in Australia and the unemployment within the three groups Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The picture below shows the use of renewable energy accounting for the total energy from 1971 to 2006 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Most employers nowa days put increasing emphasize on social skills Some people believe that social skills are important in addition to good qualifications for job success To what extend so you agree or disagree 61
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
he salary of any employee is commensurate ...
^^
Line 1, column 292, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
...are some drawbacks to this discrepancy, I believe that the imbalance is justified...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1723.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.66776315789 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27669722732 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578947368421 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 551.7 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.1679532728 49.4020404114 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 101.352941176 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8823529412 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.52941176471 7.06120827912 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125061073058 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0409538893001 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0409165370593 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.071340922474 0.151304729494 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0142349385366 0.056905535591 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.31 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.47 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.