It is important for children to learn the difference between right and wrong at an early age.Punishment is necessary to help them learn this distinction.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
What sort of punishment should parents and teachers be allowed to use to teach good behaviour to children?
Children are usually not aware of the mistakes they make, such as talking loudly when having meals, taking other's belongings without asking for permission. Those mistakes may exert bad impacts on their behavior in future. Thus, it is crucial for teachers and parents to tell them what is right and what is wrong. In my opinion, punishment is needed, but it should be in a reasonable way kids can realize their mistakes.
To begin with, children can quickly foster good habits for fear of being punished. If they keep being naughty, talking in class, teachers could punish those students in hope of warning other students of the same behavior. After punishment like standing in the front of the classroom, they can behave well in class in the future. Moreover, some mistakes are extremely dangerous and once they make those mistakes, severe punishments must be implemented by parents. For instance, if a child takes candy from a stranger, we have no idea whether the candy contains medicine and there is a possibility that the child will be kidnapped. Hence, if parents find that their children cannot refuse things from strangers, they must punish them in case they will be in danger.
In terms of the kind of punishment, parents and teachers should utilize the right way. For parents, they are not supposed to teach their kids a lesson by not giving them food to eat. After all, no matter what mistake children make, they need nutritious food to grow up. For teachers, the best punishment could be to assign more homework to those who are naughty. Teachers should bear in mind that young as students are, they must be respected by others.
All in all, punishment can enable children to quickly correct their wrong behavior. Furthermore, the correct way to punish them is of great importance.
- Pterosaurs were an ancient group of winged reptiles that lived alongside the dinosaurs. Many pterosaurs were very large, some as large as a giraffe and with a wingspan of over 12 meters. Paleontologists have long wondered whether large pterosaurs were cap 70
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed 58
- All parents should be required to volunteer their time to their children's schools. 58
- The diagram below shows how geothermal energy is used to produce electricity.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 91
- The charts below show the main reasons for study among students of different age groups and the amount of support they received from employers.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 212, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...may exert bad impacts on their behavior in future. Thus, it is crucial for teachers and p...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 368, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a reasonable way" with adverb for "reasonable"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... punishment is needed, but it should be in a reasonable way kids can realize their mistakes. To ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, hence, if, may, moreover, so, thus, well, after all, for instance, kind of, such as, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1499.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91475409836 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47661462376 2.80592935109 88% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550819672131 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 438.3 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.0734661846 49.4020404114 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 88.1764705882 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9411764706 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.70588235294 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 13.0 3.9879759519 326% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182274900964 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0698094159678 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0547282708376 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132187995254 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0297756613236 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 50.2224549098 142% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.3001002004 67% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.9 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.