It is inevitable that traditional cultures will be lost as technology develops Technology and traditional cultures are incompatible To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view

Essay topics:

It is inevitable that traditional cultures will be lost as technology develops. Technology and traditional cultures are incompatible.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view?

Tradition and technology has become a hot topic in recent years. As technology is becoming increasingly popular it is unavoidable that traditional cultures will lose there credibility. Technology and traditional culture can not become compatible with each other. This essay will argue that why development in technologies would not have any effect on society traditions despite some small changes.

Although some old generation people believe that technology will wipe out their traditions, it is because of the reason that these people has not adopted these advancements in technology. For example, marriage cards were sent by mail in traditional way in old times but now they can be sent through the use of technology because of these developments they think traditions are lost whereas it is just a new way of sending marriage cards.

In contrast to this, it is strongly condemned that technology would affect any traditions. Old generation people does not know how technology works in every aspect of life which leads them to a belief that culture traditions are in danger or incompatible. Rather then following this belief, they can start opting it by learning and understanding technology developments which eventually would make their lives easier. For instance, in the UK, children are able to get their education through online home schooling rather then following a traditional way of education because they have understood and made it compatible with their lives. Overall, the idea that society norms would be lost due to technology developments is ill-informed and is a mere evidence of illiteracy and can potentially make them outcasts from the society.

In conclusion, this essay argued that people who are against technology development are old and have flawed understanding and underestimate the benefits of the technology even in culture traditions. In my opinion, I completely disagree that technology would do any harm to cultures and it is entirely justified that they both are compatible.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-10-07 dorae 61 view
2023-08-16 dorae 56 view
2022-11-26 thuyan1211 78 view
2022-02-09 tranvuongphuongmy 67 view
2021-12-01 Emma1998 84 view
Essays by user hsn9600 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 66, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...has become a hot topic in recent years. As technology is becoming increasingly pop...
^^
Line 5, column 257, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Rather,
...aditions are in danger or incompatible. Rather then following this belief, they can st...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 264, Rule ID: RATHER_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'than'? 'than' is used for comparisons, 'then' is an expression of time.
Suggestion: than
...s are in danger or incompatible. Rather then following this belief, they can start o...
^^^^
Line 5, column 522, Rule ID: RATHER_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'than'? 'than' is used for comparisons, 'then' is an expression of time.
Suggestion: than
...on through online home schooling rather then following a traditional way of educatio...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, then, whereas, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, in contrast to, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 24.0651302605 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1702.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3690851735 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04136613221 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.526813880126 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 547.2 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.7466112872 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.923076923 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3846153846 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.61538461538 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.389259428305 0.244688304435 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.160270608521 0.084324248473 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0704336676571 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.256558522752 0.151304729494 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0850695139636 0.056905535591 149% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.