It is more important for governments to spend public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle in order to prevent illness than to spend it on treatment of people who are already ill. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some people suggest that governments should allocate financial resources to encourage a healthy living style to prevent the development of illnesses instead of pouring money into treatments for sick people. Personally, I partly agree with the notion as governments should stress equal importance on both categories for the well-being of the general public.
On the one hand, it is essential that public expenditure be spent on the promotion of healthy lifestyles in order to increase citizens’ resistance to diseases. Specifically, a healthy lifestyle would require people to participate in more physical activities, adopt a balanced diet and eliminate harmful habits, directly benefiting individuals’ immune system and metabolism and lowering the possibility of acquiring illnesses. Therefore, governments’ provision of funding for campaigns and facilities that advocate healthy living ways will improve public health standards, which in turn reduces medical spending in the future.
On the other hand, authorities should also take into account patients with inevitable ailments, who are in great need of healthcare support. In fact, various hereditary diseases or injuries resulted from accidents cannot be prevented by taking preventative measures. Besides, under the pressure of working and studying, individuals may suffer from serious mental problems. If governments neglect such cases, timely treatments cannot be provided, which will aggravate the conditions or even lead to death. Consequently, public money should also be distributed to the treatment of already ill individuals.
To conclude, despite debatable opinions on determining how public financial resources should be used, I endorse the hypothesis that they should be distributed equally between the promotion of a healthy lifestyle and medical treatment. While the former hinders illnesses from developing, the latter improves the condition of many patients.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-02 | nguyen.ttn1998 | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-12 | pwlihnkt | 84 | view |
| 2022-10-22 | khanhkhanhkhanhkhanhkhanh | 73 | view |
| 2022-08-10 | nhattram39 | 84 | view |
| 2022-08-10 | nhattram39 | 84 | view |
- In some cities the government is trying to reduce traffic for example by tax vehicles more on rush hour Is this a positive or negative development 61
- Governments in major cities around the world spend enormous expenditure for restoration of old buildings This money should be used for providing new housing and road development Do you agree or disagree 84
- Some people believe that school children should not be given homework by their teachers whereas others argue that homework plays an important role in the education of children Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- Some people think that personal happiness is directly affected by economic success Others think that there are completely different factors that are more important Discuss both views and give your opinions 89
- Students should focus on all subjects in school equally or should learn only subjects that they are best at or interest in the most Discuss both views and give your own opinion 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 342, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...th categories for the well-being of the general public. On the one hand, it is essential that...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, if, may, so, therefore, well, while, in fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1661.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.95340501792 5.12529762239 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07109273563 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.655913978495 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 515.7 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.7794151793 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.416666667 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.25 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.08333333333 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2996636711 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0969809332658 0.084324248473 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0641778307925 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169734695293 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0525902564999 0.056905535591 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 13.0946893788 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.53 12.4159519038 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.06 8.58950901804 129% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.