Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems, as well as practical problems.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
In this increasingly interdependent world, businesses and students, to enhance their living standards, have to travel abroad to different foreign countries in which languages and cultural identities significantly vary. Therefore, it is commonly believed that an unfamiliar lingual environment would lead to several problems in communication skills. While travelers might initially face an abundance of issues in society, I am of the opinion that they would soon adapt and be acquainted with the lingual and cultural diversity.
On the one hand, it is partially true that people who first come to a foreign nation could be overwhelmed and stressed by the burden of mastering a new language. As a consequence they could be hyperbolic about this stress, leading to the way of communicating being seriously affected. For instance, according to recent surveys, a majority of exchange students to European countries admitted that they needed a lot of time to catch the native’s speed of talking and accent. Thus, this results in their social communication being discouraged and worse relationships between them and their surrounding neighborhoods.
On the other hand, I believe that human's survival instinct can help break down the language barrier. To be more specific, it is proven by scientists and anthropologists that human have an infinite instinct to foster themselves to survive the difficulties or even fatal danger, let alone the struggle of learning another language. Hence, people who encounter obstacles in acquiring a language will soon be accustomed to the local environment. Furthermore in this day and age, people, or learners could use their smart devices to aid them in having conversations and even support them to be excel in certain languages, thanks to the highly advanced technology.
In summary, whereas the belief in the inclination of facing social problems is understandable as people long for time to be adept in using a new language, I strongly hold the view that human instinct, along with cutting-edge gadgets, would incentive them to learn and adapt faster.
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 89
- The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014 84
- The maps below show the Happy Valley Shopping Center in 1982 and 2012 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Many young people now know more about international pop and movie stars than famous people in the history of their countries What are the causes Give solutions to increase the number of people to know about famous people in history 67
- The chart below shows the number of households in the US by their annual income in 2007 2011 and 2015 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 35, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
...s. On the other hand, I believe that humans survival instinct can help break down t...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 443, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
...be accustomed to the local environment. Furthermore in this day and age, people, or learner...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, hence, if, so, therefore, thus, whereas, while, for instance, in summary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1768.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 328.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39024390244 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11515552295 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.600609756098 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 539.1 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.0539557641 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.333333333 106.682146367 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.3333333333 20.7667163134 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.25 7.06120827912 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130957754631 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0471049329326 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0315321098595 0.0667982634062 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0786502384831 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0236291653576 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.42 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.