Many animal species in the world are becoming extinct nowadays. Some people say that countries and individuals should protect these animals from dying out, while others say we should concentrate more on the problems of human beings. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Opinions differ as to whether the government should raise more awareness on animals or humans. Admittedly, both views are reasonable with its merits; however, I tend to be convinced by the former idea, considering that it is beneficial for both humans and faunas, in addition to the possibility of preventing ecological disasters.
Rationally, people who opt to focus on humans’ hurdles typically assume that there is a myriad of emerging issues, which need to be resolved as soon as possible, especially in developing nations. To put it simply, urgent problems including poverty, inevitable diseases and poor hygiene still exist, which undermine not only adults but also children’s well-being. Indeed, some even passed away due to the lack of health maintenance. In addition, in light of the Covid-19 pandemic, which threatens different areas simultaneously, dwellers’ living conditions are getting worse.
Conversely, a reason which convinces me to reject the previous idea is that miscellaneous species of animals’ depletion subsequently break the original form of food chains as well as eco-balance, which brings negative impacts to human beings. To clarify, had it not been for the existence of faunas, humans would not have been supplied with foods and resources. Furthermore, the more animals disappear, the more ecological disasters are exerted, which implies that preserving endangered species is rather indispensable.
In conclusion, people have the rationale to claim that the government shall center around human beings. Despite this, I still support the opinion of preserving species which are on the brink of extinction since it is more advantageous and aims for the long-run betterment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-09 | idid382021 | 84 | view |
| 2022-08-07 | idid382021 | 89 | view |
| 2022-08-06 | idid382021 | 89 | view |
| 2022-08-04 | hellielts | 89 | view |
| 2022-01-11 | mmy | 73 | view |
- Some people think that environmental problems are too big for individuals to solve Others however believe that these problems cannot be solved if individuals do not take actions Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
- Countries with a long average working time are more economically successful than those countries which do not have a long working time To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Developments in science and technology have caused environmental problems Some people think that a simpler way of life will protect the environment while others believe that science and technology can solve environmental problems Discuss both views and gi 89
- Many animal species in the world are becoming extinct nowadays Some people say that countries and individuals should protect these animals from dying out while others say we should concentrate more on the problems of human beings Discuss both views and gi 78
- Some people think that success in life comes from hard work and determination while others think that there are more important factors such as money and appearance Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 17, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
Opinions differ as to whether the government should raise more awaren...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and aims for the long-run betterment.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, furthermore, however, if, so, still, well, as to, in addition, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1456.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.5785440613 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06308360532 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.651340996169 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 445.5 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.8547173283 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.363636364 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7272727273 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0909090909 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165850102887 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0589248431747 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0417409722538 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0988673013335 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0396932529577 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.38 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.52 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.