Many countries are experiencing serious problems with their environment, with pollution of their land, water and air.
What are these problems and how might they be reduced?
Pollution is one of the common problem in international community. I believe that the education society and the law enforcement are the main trouble. Therefore, allocating money from state budget for education and enacting bill to rule the society are the solution to resolve this problem.
In the basic, education is the key to resolve the obstacle in society. Nowadays, every nation has problem with environment. The root of the problem is the humankind lifestyle such as throwing trash not in recycle bin or washing clothes in the river. Generally, these action are common in the several places in the developing country including Indonesia. Actually, these measures could be eradicated by a good education. For example, Japan introduces the culture to wash our hand before we go to bed. Literally, Indonesian Minister of education has program to embed the clean culture for Indonesian kids, but the money to resolve that problem is too much.
The second problem is the law creating by the government. As we know, Roscoe Pound, a law expert from The US, said that law as a tool of social engineering. It’s mean that, law can change the culture in society. Wasting trash in everywhere, washing clothes in the riverside, spill in public places are the sample of bad culture. The state could enact the act to avoid those activities. For example, Singapore in 1970’s was categorized as the dirty state, but everything had changes in 1990’s. it was not happened, if the government were not creating the bill to give sanction for all people violating the bill.
In conclusion, the pollution is the tremendous matter for all nation. However, it could be tackled by create a program to change the curriculum in the school, but the government has the obligation to pay it. Furthermore, the government can create the bill to convert the people’s culture.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 261, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this action' or 'these actions'?
Suggestion: this action; these actions
...ashing clothes in the river. Generally, these action are common in the several places in the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 548, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'programed', 'programmed'.
Suggestion: programed; programmed
...y, Indonesian Minister of education has program to embed the clean culture for Indonesi...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 410, Rule ID: IN_1990s[2]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 1970’s'.
Suggestion: in the 1970’s
...hose activities. For example, Singapore in 1970’s was categorized as the dirty state, but...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 483, Rule ID: IN_1990s[2]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 1990’s'.
Suggestion: in the 1990’s
...dirty state, but everything had changes in 1990’s. it was not happened, if the government...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 494, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
..., but everything had changes in 1990’s. it was not happened, if the government wer...
^^
Line 4, column 290, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e bill to convert the people’s culture.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, furthermore, however, if, second, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1552.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02265372168 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80140785443 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.533980582524 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 490.5 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.8630442439 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.6 106.682146367 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.45 20.7667163134 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.95 7.06120827912 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.11710984955 0.244688304435 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0386058686007 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0504901196085 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0711440325855 0.151304729494 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0475268512835 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.0946893788 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.54 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.