In many countries around the world, rural people are moving to cities, so the population in the countryside is decreasing. Do you think this is a positive or a negative development?
In recent times, local residents living in the rural areas tend to relocate in large metropolis, and this phenomenon results in a decreased number of individuals in the countryside. From my own point of view, this development might influence detrimentally to the prospection of many nations across the globe.
On the first hand, the number of people living in towns and villages has witnessed a dramatic decrease, which leads to the lack of labor force in the countryside where the investment for development is more necessary than cities. In fact, many outskirt areas do not receive sufficient allocations from the government to the renovation of countryside. As a result, the young generations find that there is no point in applying for an occupation in the rural regions, so a huge proportion of the young people migrate to the big cities in search for more well-paid jobs. However, this causes the serious reduction in the actions to reconstruct the villages and towns. In other words, living standard in the countryside might not be enhanced, which is the major reason for the sufferings from hunger and illness of the local people.
On the other hand, with the large number of citizens living in urban regions, pollution in big cities is unavoidable. As a matter of fact, more population in the metropolis is synonymous with more consumption and more waste from the increasing number of households. By way of illustration, Hanoi city, the capital of Vietnam, has suffered from noise pollution for more than two decades because of the rise in private vehicles and the breakthrough of tall buildings or apartments. Nowadays, most households in Hanoi own at least an automobile or a bike that emit a noticeable amount of noise. Additionally, the construction of tall buildings takes a considerable period of time, which partly annoy the way of living of city residents. Consequently, the prolonged exposure to high level of noise might lead to health deterioration among the city population, especially hearing problems. Some surveys have indicated that the noise in Hanoi sometime reaches 150 decibels, which affect negatively to our hearings.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that the migration of rural population to the urban areas would have a wide range of deleterious impact on the way we live our ordinary life.
- Scientist predict it in the near future cars will be driven by computers not people Why Do you think it is a positive or negative development 79
- Some people think students should study the science of food and how to prepare it Other think students should spend time on more important subjects Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- Some people think that boys and girls should be educated in the same schools Others however believe that girls achieve better results when educated in single sex schools Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- There is too much noise in many public places in cities What are the causes of this problem What can be done to solve the problem 73
- The best way to solve the world s environmental problems in to increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 662, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
... of tall buildings takes a considerable period of time, which partly annoy the way of living o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, however, if, so, well, at least, in conclusion, in fact, as a matter of fact, as a result, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 68.0 41.998997996 162% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.3376753507 240% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1948.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 381.0 315.596192385 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11286089239 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41805628031 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98086937245 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53280839895 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 613.8 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 39.9313855952 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.866666667 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.66666666667 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156264497813 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0468768461745 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0309350168791 0.0667982634062 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0942513414715 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0425883264045 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 662, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
... of tall buildings takes a considerable period of time, which partly annoy the way of living o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, however, if, so, well, at least, in conclusion, in fact, as a matter of fact, as a result, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 68.0 41.998997996 162% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.3376753507 240% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1948.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 381.0 315.596192385 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11286089239 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41805628031 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98086937245 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53280839895 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 613.8 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 39.9313855952 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.866666667 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.66666666667 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156264497813 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0468768461745 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0309350168791 0.0667982634062 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0942513414715 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0425883264045 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.