In many countries, people like to eat a variety of imported food rather than the local food. Do you think the advantages of this trend outweigh the disadvantages?
There are heaps of food brought into people’s lives. Imported food now play a vital role in people’s diet and not the domestic food in many countries. Despite that the food from other countries is much popular for some people recently, there is no doubt that the local food should be valued as much as possible.
Obviously, local food is a suitable choice for people’s eating habits and customs. Eating too much imported food might lead to our health problems. The structure of our body systems is designed to adapt the traditional way of eating. Some people when they eat these food such as cheese would have a digestion disease more easily than people who are accustomed to them. Furthermore, imported food is a shock to the local eating customs. We could understand local customs and practices from these food materials and cuisines, which are carrying out from generations to generations. The less people support the local food, the less traditions could save in our memories.
However, people should enjoy the right of one of the benefits of globalization—imported food. But it is certainly true that the tariffs as well as the cost of transportation and fabrication must be part of their prices, only a few people could afford them as a regular food in their lives. As a result, it would cause higher imbalance in consumption and the gap between rich and poor.
In conclusion, it is not a good trend that people enjoy the imported food more than local food. Although imported food could give us a chance of cross-cultural communication, we should advocate traditional and equal lifestyle by local food.
- The chart below shows the percentage of the whole world population in four countries from 1950-2002, with projections to 2050. 73
- Developments in science and technology have caused environmental problems. Some people think that a simpler way of life will protect the environment, while others believe that science and technology can solve environmental problems. Discuss both views and 73
- Universities and colleges are now offering qualifications through distance learning from the Internet rather than teachers in the classroom. Do you think the advantages of this development overweight the disadvantages? 67
- In modern societies, it is possible for people to go shopping, work and communicate via the internet without face-to-face communication. Is it a positive or negative development? 78
- Some people think that the best way to improve road safety is to increase the minimum legal age for driving a car or motor-bike. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 266, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this food' or 'these foods'?
Suggestion: this food; these foods
...ay of eating. Some people when they eat these food such as cheese would have a digestion d...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 590, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun people is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...ut from generations to generations. The less people support the local food, the less...
^^^^
Line 3, column 630, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun traditions is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...less people support the local food, the less traditions could save in our memories. ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, so, well, in conclusion, no doubt, such as, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1364.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99633699634 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97620343756 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.538461538462 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 406.8 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.0722120888 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.9333333333 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.53333333333 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.383337169842 0.244688304435 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.156543804155 0.084324248473 186% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0961927708388 0.0667982634062 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.255366690652 0.151304729494 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0776318372359 0.056905535591 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.