Many developing countries are currently expanding their tourist industries. Why is this the case? Is it a positive development?
In developing countries, there is a trend that is the expansion of the tourism sector. My essay will shed light on the causes of this development and I strongly suppose that it exerts positive impacts on developing countries in spite of its drawbacks.
There is little room for doubt that there are manifold reasons why governments should concentrate on national tourism industries. Firstly, expanding tourism does wonders for global integration because it brings an excellent opportunity for developing countries to promote their national images and get exposed to other economies. As a result, this paves the way for economic coordination among countries in the world. Secondly, tourism can be a contributing factor to the national budget in order to strengthen the developing country’s economy. Thanks to that, the government could derive foreign money from the tourist industry by imposing taxes on tourist activities.
On the other hand, the expansion of tourism exerts adverse impacts on manifold aspects of developing countries. First, the extension of tourist industries is the culprit of environmental contamination in developing nations. An explanation is that the tourist industry creates a huge number of plastic waste while the systems of recycling waste in many developing countries are far from appropriate for dealing with plastic pollution. Furthermore, the development of infrastructures and facilities in order to accommodate the expansion of the tourist industry can pose a threat to local areas. As a consequence, it gives rise to permanent damages to natural surroundings and deprives animals of natural habitats as well.
In conclusion, in developing nations, while there are several disadvantages of extending tourism, it is my contention that governments should boost their tourist industries because of its benefits.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-12-06 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 89 | view |
| 2022-12-06 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 73 | view |
| 2022-09-01 | Lê Khánh Diệp | 78 | view |
| 2022-09-01 | Lê Khánh Diệp | 84 | view |
| 2021-11-19 | UP | 84 | view |
- Many people think that secondary and high school students should learn money management as it is an important life skill To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- Some people prefer to have temporary jobs which means they only work a few months in a year and use the rest of the time to do what they want What is your opinion 73
- In some countries more young adults continue to live with their parents even after they have completed education and found jobs Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 78
- Some people believe that studying at university or college is the best route to a successful career while others believe that it is better to get a job straight after school Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- Some people believe that studying at university or college is the best route to a successful career while others believe that it is better to get a job straight after school Discuss both views and give your opinion 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, then, well, while, in conclusion, as a result, in spite of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1570.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.60714285714 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15677922922 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.542857142857 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 486.9 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.7189832843 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.769230769 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5384615385 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5384615385 7.06120827912 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.402310577517 0.244688304435 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131961718215 0.084324248473 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0674263486799 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.237371232744 0.151304729494 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0366179967556 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.64 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.