Many people say the gap between rich and poor people is wider, as rich people become richer and poor people grow poorer.
What problems could this situation cause and what measures can be done to address those problems?
Inequality between rich and poor has received a lot of public attention in recent decades due to its significant societal consequences. While it is conspicuous that the problems associated with the disorder are widespread, there are alternatives available.
In reality, it is clear that there are a number of issues caused by wealth disparities. Initially, as the rich get richer and the poor get poorer, there will be an increasing number of people who are unable to make a living or are unemployed. As the number of unemployed workers rises, so will the number of criminal offences because these people will be forced to commit illegal acts in order to survive. Second, because they own the majority of the wealth, the wealthy have the ability to influence politicians and even legislators to enact laws that benefit them at the expense of the poor. There is abundant proof, for example, that real estate companies and private banks in Vietnam have become even wealthier as a result of the Vietnamese government's policies.
Notwithstanding, there are innumerable solutions to the problems associated with the rich-poor disparity. One of the best solutions is for governments to raise tax rates on the wealthy. The proceeds can be used to build infrastructure such as hospitals and new roads, thereby improving the lives of the majority of the population. In addition to tax policies, the government can provide free education to ensure that all people have equal opportunities. For illustration, Canada's free education policy has drastically decreased the gap between rich and poor.
In conclusion, while wealth disparities can cause a variety of issues, there are numerous workable solutions. Governments can create a more equitable and inclusive society by providing free educational opportunities and changing tax policies.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-18 | Tien Hoang | 84 | view |
| 2023-10-18 | Tien Hoang | 84 | view |
| 2023-04-17 | NUT | 89 | view |
| 2023-03-24 | hyst12 | 89 | view |
| 2022-12-03 | Luisjackiet | 78 | view |
- Some people believe that international trade and communication with other countries is a positive trend while others think it is harmful to nations and they might lose their identities To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement Give your 89
- As people live longer and longer the idea of cloning human beings in order to provide spare parts is becoming a reality The idea horrifies most people yet it is no longer mere science fiction To what extent do you agree with such a procedure Give reasons 78
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 78
- Due to the development and rapid expansion of supermarkets in some countries many small local business are unable to compete Some people think that the closure of local business will bring about the death of local communities To what extent do you agree o 56
- Crimes and other kinds of information on television and newspaper have adverse consequences This kind of information to be restricted to be shown in media To what extend do you agree or disagree 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, so, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1550.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34482758621 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0796868133 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.575862068966 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 500.4 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.6936807962 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.714285714 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7142857143 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248436201153 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0746818263374 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0622186059701 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128148779608 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0570625513766 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.75 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.