Many students find it difficult to concentrate or pay attention at school. What are the reasons? What could be done to solve this problem?
The issue of limited concentration among students has gained public attention and sparked controversies in recent years. In this essay, the reasons behind this phenomenon will be discussed, along with potential solutions.
Two factors contribute to the lack of concentration among students. The first is the prevalence of distractions, such as noisy television or social media use, which surround children. Many parents inadvertently disturb their children's learning environments by engaging in noise-making activities while their kids study. Studies have shown that children are naturally curious, making it challenging for them to ignore these distractions and focus on their current activities. As a result, children may struggle with attention difficulties.
Another contributing factor is the lack of recognition and encouragement provided by teachers in overcrowded classrooms. Students may feel neglected and disengaged from lessons if they are not consistently acknowledged or praised. Teachers may find it difficult to give individual attention to each student when classes are large, which can lead to a lack of motivation among students.
To address this issue, two practical solutions are suggested. Firstly, parents should be mindful of their children's mental development and create an effective studying environment that minimizes distractions. By doing so, children will have more opportunities to practice concentration and improve their focus on schoolwork. Secondly, teachers should improve their observation skills in class to identify students who need encouragement or attention. By providing recognition and attention to students, teachers can increase motivation and engagement in their lessons.
In conclusion, the prevalence of distractions and lack of recognition and encouragement in the classroom are the primary reasons for limited concentration among students. However, there are practical solutions available that can help alleviate this issue.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-04 | hien3112 | 78 | view |
| 2023-09-07 | ngo viet | 56 | view |
| 2023-08-19 | Nguyen Hai Dang | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-17 | ngango56 | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-15 | Anne020304 | 89 | view |
- The table and charts below give information on the police budget for 2017 and 2018 in one area of Britain The table shows where the money came from and the charts show how it was distributed 73
- The maps below show the layouts of the nature Museum between 2010 and 2013 67
- The graph shows the number of people taking part in 4 kinds of sports in a particular region between 1985 and 2005 76
- Many students find it difficult to concentrate or pay attention at school What are the reasons What could be done to solve this problem 78
- The table and charts below give information on the police budget for 2017 and 2018 in one area of Britain The table shows where the money came from and the charts show how it was distributed 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, while, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 8.3376753507 276% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1699.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.0462633452 5.12529762239 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.29072406662 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597864768683 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 504.0 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.3687742827 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.9411764706 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5294117647 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.05882352941 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143543023991 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.04643259764 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0382058600866 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0907256927858 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0478213089413 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.31 50.2224549098 76% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.51 12.4159519038 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.88 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.