In the modern world people no longer need to use food or products from animals such as medicine and clothing Do you agree or disagree

Essay topics:

In the modern world, people no longer need to use food or products from animals, such as medicine and clothing. Do you agree or disagree?

These days, with the advancement of technology, human can replace animal products with synthetic ones. Therefore, some people believe that it will soon be needless to use animals for food or medical experiments. Personally, I agree the idea to a certain extent.

Firstly, with respect to food, there has been an increase in the number of vegetarians recently. Plants and herbs can provide sufficient nutrients for our body to function normally. Furthermore, meat is considered to be poisonous due to pollution and chemicals. For example, fish living in contaminated water areas may contain toxic substances for human health. However, meat is indispensable to create a diversity of cuisine culture in the world. Consequently, it is impossible to totally eliminate animal-based food.

Secondly, animal testing has played an inevitable role in medicine. Although this practice is unethical and debatable, it is important to find a cure for human diseases. Fortunately, thanks to the advances and breakthroughs in science and technology, scientists has made every effort to minimize the use of animals. Nevertheless, there are some false beliefs that some parts of animals, for example rhino horns and monkey brains, can treat various illnesses. Additionally, people no longer need to use fur for clothing as they can produce synthetic fibres to make clothes.

In conclusion, there are some fields that humans can eradicate the use of animals, yet it is impractical to stop using them altogether. My view is that human should limit the need of animal products as much as possible.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-10-28 chichinn 78 view
2023-10-02 chichinn 84 view
2020-09-07 Syed Muhammad Ali Raza 73 view
2020-07-18 Binh1671 78 view
2020-03-11 talgatibraevich 84 view
Essays by user hntnhung.ptnk@… :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, however, may, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, with respect to

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1336.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 250.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.344 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01867255594 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.644 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 427.5 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.1722061546 49.4020404114 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 83.5 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.625 20.7667163134 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.1875 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194184664597 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0587448787534 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0601420055843 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118872490772 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0363168641798 0.056905535591 64% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.