Some people think that the best way to improve road safety is to increase the minimum legal age for driving a car or motorbike. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Many individuals believe that raising the lowest legal age for using motorized vehicles is the optimal method to increase road safety. Personally, I agree with this statement to a certain extent because I am convinced that there are better solutions for this issue.
On the one hand, a higher age limit for drivers is beneficial for road safety enhancement. Firstly, young people tend to lack caution and patience, hence they will have reckless driving behavior such racing or running red lights. Secondly, due to the deficiency of experience, adolescents cannot find feasible solutions when they face problematic situations in driving. For instance, if the brakes stop working unexpectedly, young drivers may become panic, which can lead to tragic accidents. Consequently, increasing driving age can lower the number of traffic fatalities.
On the other hand, there are more practical approaches to enhance road safety. Government should impose more severe punishments on traffic violators such as longer prison sentences or more heavy fine. Therefore, drivers will drive more responsibly regardless of their legal driving age. Furthermore, authorities can launch campaigns about road safety to raise people’s consciousness and help chauffeurs fully understand dangers of road accidents. Additionally, driving tests should be more challenging to ensure a person is mentally and physically fit to operate a vehicle.
In conclusion, although increasing driving age is a reliable way to reduce casualty, humans can adopt more effective methods. My view is that people should combine multiple changes in different aspects to address road safety issues.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-01 | emzin | 61 | view |
| 2023-06-20 | UYNDNG | 89 | view |
| 2023-06-20 | UYNDNG | 89 | view |
| 2023-04-10 | hieu13092006 | 61 | view |
| 2023-01-29 | Charles Le | 73 | view |
- Some people claim that public museums and art galleries will not be needed because people can see historical objects and works of art by using a computer Do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people claim that public museums and art galleries will not be needed because people can see historical objects and works of art by using a computer Do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people think that the best way to improve road safety is to increase the minimum legal age for driving a car or motorbike To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Some people believe that having sport in schools is a waste of time and resources whilst other people believe that sport in schools is a vital part of education Discuss both these views and give your opinion 84
- Some people believe that living in big cities is getting more difficult Others believe that it is becoming easier Discuss both views and give your own opinion
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 503, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'ensuring'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'challenge' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: ensuring
...riving tests should be more challenging to ensure a person is mentally and physically fit...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 41.998997996 55% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1415.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 250.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.66 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90392561888 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.672 0.561755894193 120% => OK
syllable_count: 439.2 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.3022002867 49.4020404114 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 101.071428571 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8571428571 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5 7.06120827912 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252278922286 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0828697867775 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0558738654968 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151590818991 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0191379129796 0.056905535591 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.25 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.16 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.