More and more people want to buy clothes, car and other products from well-known brands. What are the reasons? Do you think it is a positive or negative development?
Nowadays, some people purchase clothing or goods from luxury brands, while others feel it is unnecessary. This issue has been a controversial debate topic for a long time. I strongly opine that this exists on both sides of development and I will explain my view below.
On the one hand, there are some reasons for well-known brands becoming a trend in modern society. Firstly, those brands offer consumers the most comprehensive choice in the quantity of goods. For example, comparing the quality of popular cosmetics, it is always superior to the ones from small businesses. Thus, the items are credible and give people satisfaction with high-end fashion. Moreover, workers earn high salaries and affordable luxury brands are worthy of their effort. Because they enhance their appearance and show off their social status or wealth. Besides, enjoying high-quality service from famous brands reduces stress after a hard day's work.
On the other hand, there are also some drawbacks. The discrepancy between rich people and the destitute could result in tension and conflict in society. Hence, negative effects on human relationships when they judge others by the items they use. For instance, many young people tend to buy an iPhone with a price tag that doubles or triples their salary in order to compare it with their friends. However, the value of fashionable brands tends to be more temporary than permanent. Numerous products from well known brands are eliminated because of environmental pollution.
In conclusion, we cannot deny the impact of luxury brands on modern society. However, we balanced the provider between famous and small businesses to protect the global economy.
- The table below shows expenditures on advertising of four car companies in the UK in 2002
- Some people think that too much attention and too many resources are given to the protection of wild animals and birds Do you agree or disagree 61
- The bar graph below shows the entrolment of students in music in an Australian university from 2000 ta 2006 and the pir chart shows how they choose their career after their course 84
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why students chose to study at a particular UK university in 1987 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make a comparison where relevant 73
- The line graph shows the average number of weekly patients visiting four clinics of a hospital from 2010 to 2016 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 573, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ated because of environmental pollution. In conclusion, we cannot deny the impact...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, firstly, hence, however, moreover, so, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1425.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29739776952 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66939866871 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.650557620818 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 438.3 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.7019480159 49.4020404114 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 83.8235294118 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8235294118 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.88235294118 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216412130627 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0564766627914 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.048521444164 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109184517904 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0644963993117 0.056905535591 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.16 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.