More and more people want to buy clothes, car and other products from well-known brands. What are the reasons? Do you think it is a positive or negative development?
Nowadays, more and more rich people use famous brands. That demonstrates their social status and wealth. But using well-known brand really wastes money and instead of spending money on clothes or a car, they can take care of themselves. So I will discuss both points of view in this essay.
On the one hand, famous brands that help them accumulate wealth. And the rich people want to buy them to increase their value or enhance appearance. There are several examples of these cars from luxury brands such as Porsche and Mercedes, which stand out in this category. These are often exorbitant due to their materials and unique features. Because brand names are more expensive, but they are credible and give people satisfaction when using them. In addition, the rich people they like appear in front of everyone so they can’t wear clothes cheaper and from a small brand. The fact that they wear famous clothes also helps the producer advertise their brand.
On the other hand, luxurious brands waste more money and time when shopping. Additionally, you should make the poor people jealous when they don't have anything. For example, poor people see someone richer than them. They want to know that things belong to them. And that thing leads to social disparity. Therefor, instead of buying clothes or cars, they can take care of themselves to enhance their value.
As a conclusion, famous brands are good for themselves, but they have to maintain a balance.
- Cyclists and car drivers sharing the same road cause some problems What are the problems What are the solutions 56
- Some people think that young people should be required to do unpaid work helping people in the community Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 78
- The animal species are becoming extinct due to human activities on land and in sea What are the reasons and solutions 73
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The charts below show the proportion of the energy produced from different sources in a country between 1985 and 2003 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison 78
- The charts below show the percentage of volunteers by organizations in 2008 and 2014 67
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 141, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... make the poor people jealous when they dont have anything. For example, poor people...
^^^^
Line 3, column 405, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...re of themselves to enhance their value. As a conclusion, famous brands are good ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, really, so, well, for example, in addition, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 41.998997996 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1217.0 1615.20841683 75% => OK
No of words: 246.0 315.596192385 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94715447154 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36121482472 2.80592935109 84% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 176.041082164 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.565040650407 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 359.1 506.74238477 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.8150568796 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 71.5882352941 106.682146367 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.4705882353 20.7667163134 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.76470588235 7.06120827912 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238006497599 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0740726557918 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0589894741131 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140105510946 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0628288433102 0.056905535591 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.1 13.0946893788 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 50.2224549098 131% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.3001002004 67% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.84 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.41 8.58950901804 86% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 78.4519038076 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 9.78957915832 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 141, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... make the poor people jealous when they dont have anything. For example, poor people...
^^^^
Line 3, column 405, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...re of themselves to enhance their value. As a conclusion, famous brands are good ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, really, so, well, for example, in addition, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 41.998997996 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1217.0 1615.20841683 75% => OK
No of words: 246.0 315.596192385 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94715447154 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36121482472 2.80592935109 84% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 176.041082164 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.565040650407 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 359.1 506.74238477 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.8150568796 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 71.5882352941 106.682146367 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.4705882353 20.7667163134 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.76470588235 7.06120827912 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238006497599 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0740726557918 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0589894741131 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140105510946 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0628288433102 0.056905535591 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.1 13.0946893788 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 50.2224549098 131% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.3001002004 67% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.84 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.41 8.58950901804 86% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 78.4519038076 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 9.78957915832 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.