More attention is paid to being"responsible tourists" in order to preserve the cultural and environmental aspects of tourist places. However, some people think it is impossible to be a "responsible tourist" in the society. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
People have different opinions on whether we could be 'responsible tourists'. I think it is possible for the government and individuals to make joint effort to be responsible for keeping the cultural and natural environment of the tourist destination.
It is undeniably that tourists should build up the sense of protecting the tourist attractions they visit. Firstly, many attractions are precious cultural or environmental resources, some of which are even the World Heritage with tremendous value and significance. Those attractions are susceptible to some extent, which means that once they are undermined, the harmfulness is irreversible. Therefore, they should be delicately protected by tourists. Besides, local governments should introduce some law or policy to raise tourists' attention to preserve those places and individuals are also supposed to carry out their responsibilities while traveling. For example, uncivilised behaviour such as dropping litter about should be strictly prohibited or punished in order improve people's awareness of environmental protection.
However, some people argue that there are several factors which make it impossible to be a 'responsible tourist'. To begin with, they think that the damage of some tourist attractions are simply due to the industrialisation and the macro environmental change. Tourists can do little to alternate this situation. Furthermore, some popular attractions are so famous that it is impossible to avoid the overcrowding all the year round. Under such circumstance, even though all tourists are rule-abiding, it will also cause chronic damage to those places especially some ancient architecture or natural reserves. I think this issue is not insolvable and relevant managements should take measures to limit the maximum tourist number to mitigate this condition.
In conclusion, as long as tourists and governments raise their sense of preservation and take positive actions to protect the tourist attractions, it is probably that more responsible tourists' will appear in the near future.
- Some people think it is easier for adults to learn practical skills (such as computer skills) by themselves while others believe it is better to learn with a teacher in classroom. Discuss both sides and give your own opinion. 73
- Money for postgraduate research is limited. Some people, therefore, think that financial support from government should be only provided for scientific research rather than research for less useful subjects. To what extent do you agree or disagree with th 61
- In many countries, there are more people choose to live by themselves than before. What are the reasons of this situation? Is it positive or negative development of society? 73
- Money for postgraduate research is limited. Some people, therefore, think that financial support from government should be only provided for scientific research rather than research for less useful subjects. To what extent do you agree or disagree with th 73
- Multi-cultural society, where people of different ethnic groups live together, can bring more benefits than drawbacks to country. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, while, as to, for example, i think, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1764.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.74592833876 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25265136452 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560260586319 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 555.3 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.7016312754 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.6 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4666666667 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.66666666667 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.33024497342 0.244688304435 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114877897873 0.084324248473 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0713322033304 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.214326150697 0.151304729494 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0179354168646 0.056905535591 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.07 12.4159519038 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.