Most countries want to improve standard of living through economic development, however, others think social value is lost as a result. Do you think the advantages of economic development outweigh the disadvantages?
It is true that the majority of nations focus on thriving economic development which will flourish living standards. This issue, personally, I believe would bring considerable merits for several reasons which I will elucidate more below.
Perhaps, in my standpoint, many countries presenting strong economic growth could provide better public services such as healthcare sectors which will bring up a better quality of life. In connection with receiving numerous tax revenues in all sectors, If the government allocated huge budget in such sector, medical equipment would be more sophisticated so as to assure community’s primary care without suffering financial hardship. Furthermore, an incremental Gross Domestic Income significantly creates various job creation which will lessen impoverished communities in a nation. Reported by World Bank, the high absorption of labour demand has proved to increase Indian income which could reduce poverty rate by 12% resulting in a better welfare and prosperity.
On the other hand, it seems to me that, the tendency of societies who prioritise to earn numerous dollars could induce egocentric character pictured by developed countries. Following with hustle and bustle activities in work days, they prefer recharging their energy at home to be productive at work in the next days to joining social event surroundings. If they face an emergency situation at home, the fewer possibility they will immediately receive a help nearby. Moreover, advanced societies start showing more materialistic value to others. Instead of purchasing necessary products, they more likely purchase luxury ones aiming to flaunt their possession and social status.
In conclusion, while highlighting economic growth seems noticeable drawbacks of welfare standard to some extent. I would contradict that the benefits of this are more significant including better quality of well-being and stronger social protection.
- Despite better access to education many adults today still cannot read or write In what ways are they disadvantaged What can governments do to help them 80
- Some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change Others however think that change is always a good thing Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 80
- Tourism has been a good source of revenue in many countries and government should promote the industry Do you agree or disagree 61
- There is more and more outrage and anger common in society today Why is this Is this a positive or a negative development 67
- People nowadays send text messages more frequently than they talk on the phone What are the reasons for this trend Do the advantages of texting outweigh the disadvantages 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 356, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...l equipment would be more sophisticated so as to assure community’s primary care without...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 767, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing in a better welfare and prosperity. On the other hand, it seems to me that, ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, moreover, so, well, while, as to, in conclusion, such as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1659.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.76041666667 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97222019405 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.694444444444 0.561755894193 124% => OK
syllable_count: 512.1 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.113171562 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.615384615 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1538461538 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.104057613946 0.244688304435 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0373552689437 0.084324248473 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0431471407577 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0654143013331 0.151304729494 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0208345887809 0.056905535591 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.13 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.25 8.58950901804 131% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 78.4519038076 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.