The most important aim of science should to be improve people’s lives.
To what extend do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Although there are lots of aims and tasks in science the most important of them is to improve the quality of people’s lives. Undoubtedly, scientists have a crucial role in discovering new methods which can help to promote a person's life. In my opinion, I strongly agree and believe that without science living gets harder.
On the one hand, by growing the technology and presenting them people have more tendency to use and they become popular among people. For example, online shops which person can shop online. Not only can a person save his or her time and his or her money but also, the person has various choices to select different goods and products with a good offer. However, this removes some retail markets and some people lose their jobs. Technology changes your life extremely to an extent and makes you happy.
On the other hand, improving people’s lives is not the only task of science and there are numerous different goals and aims, but the most important and the first aim is it. Some other goals like finding out about past generous, ancient cities, and extinct animals can be mentioned. Hence, every field of science and every subject has some sub-aims and a target goal which is to promote of life quality. In addition, people can use and get familiar with different subjects and know about them which can help in real life. By knowing about various nutrients a person provides a very good recipe and enjoys eating.
In conclusion, all of the science prepares a very good situation for people that make their lives better and enjoyable which is the most important task.
- The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full time work did after leaving college in 2008
- The maps below show an industrial area in the town of Norbiton and planned future development of the site Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- the pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make 73
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons 67
- In some cultures children are often told that they can achieve anything if they try hard enough What are the advantages and disadvantages of giving children this message 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 225, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...new methods which can help to promote a persons life. In my opinion, I strongly agree a...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 91, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'numerous'.
Suggestion: numerous
... the only task of science and there are numerous different goals and aims, but the most important ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 16, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...ipe and enjoys eating. In conclusion, all of the science prepares a very good situation ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, so, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 10.4138276553 211% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1323.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79347826087 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32551970599 2.80592935109 83% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.572463768116 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 411.3 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.0570499759 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.5 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7142857143 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.21428571429 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226044830445 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0798157274499 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0851359635558 0.0667982634062 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150939507483 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0521678322563 0.056905535591 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.