The natural resources such as oil, forests and fresh water are being consumed at an alarming rate. What problems does it cause? How can we solve these problems?
In the recent year, oil, forests and fresh water are being exhausted at an alarming rate. This essay will indicate that the major issues of natural resources are being utilized for personal purposes as wood production for home decoration, and it will then make the case that the best solutions invovles reducing cut forest.
To begin with, The main trouble with natural resources is their utilization for personal purposes as wood production for home decoration. This can be explained that by the fact some people have increased their demand for wood to decorate their house where they feel a sence of pretty, stylish. Thus, increasing demand compels sellers must go to the forest to cut down a significant number of trees, which they can sell for users which they have higher incomes. As the results, in the future, the forests will no longer have trees at an alarming rate. If the condition gets worse, the forest will descrease soil adhesion, and cause flood and soil erosion. Therefore, flood and soil erosion which human’s life are infuelended by flood, soil erosion and the local people must to commute to other city and country to live.
The main tackle to that trouble is reducing cut trees at the forest. This can be clarified that by the fact the forest should be intervented by the government without people to cut down too much. Firstly, if someone keeps cutting down trees, the government should impose huge amounts of money, thousands of dollars or more. Thus, they scare about the huge amount of money and they do not have money to pay for the government. There is another way, the government can punish the person who cut down the trees and imprison the person who lost human freedom.
To sum up, the natural resouse are destroyed by humans to use demand’s purpose. This essay will highlight the significant problems arising from the exploitation of natural resources for individual needs, such as using wood for home decor. Subsequently, it will argue that the most effective solutions entail minimizing deforestation.
- A lot of places in the world rely on tourism as a main source of income Unfortunately tourism can also be a source of problems if it is not managed correctly Describe the advantages and disadvantages of tourism in the modern world Do you think that the be 89
- A lot of places in the world rely on tourism as a main source of income Unfortunately tourism can also be a source of problems if it is not managed correctly Describe the advantages and disadvantages of tourism in the modern world Do you think that benefi 73
- The natural resources such as oil forests and fresh water are being consumed at an alarming rate What problems does it cause How can we solve these problems 80
- When choosing a job the salary is the most important consideration To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- The chart below shows a comparison of different kinds of energy production in France in 1995 and 2005 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant 80
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 477, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hey have higher incomes. As the results, in the future, the forests will no longe...
^^
Line 3, column 770, Rule ID: MUST_HAVE_TO[1]
Message: After 'must', the verb is used without 'to'. Probably, you should use 'must' or 'have to' here.
Suggestion: must; have to
...lood, soil erosion and the local people must to commute to other city and country to li...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, so, then, therefore, thus, such as, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1708.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 343.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97959183673 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49531005319 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524781341108 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 518.4 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.9235186048 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.75 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4375 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06120827912 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198034923181 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0729624998341 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0892279136959 0.0667982634062 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129458878095 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0636184105776 0.056905535591 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 477, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hey have higher incomes. As the results, in the future, the forests will no longe...
^^
Line 3, column 770, Rule ID: MUST_HAVE_TO[1]
Message: After 'must', the verb is used without 'to'. Probably, you should use 'must' or 'have to' here.
Suggestion: must; have to
...lood, soil erosion and the local people must to commute to other city and country to li...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, so, then, therefore, thus, such as, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1708.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 343.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97959183673 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49531005319 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524781341108 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 518.4 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.9235186048 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.75 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4375 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06120827912 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198034923181 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0729624998341 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0892279136959 0.0667982634062 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129458878095 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0636184105776 0.056905535591 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.