Some university students want to learn about other subjects in addition to their main subjects Others believe it is more important to give all their time and attention to studying for a qualification Discuss both these views and give your own opinion

Essay topics:

Some university students want to learn about other subjects in addition to their main subjects. Others believe it is more important to give all their time and attention to studying for a qualification.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

There are different views among university students regarding the importance of diversifying their learning or just solely focusing on the main subjects. While some students argue that they are fond of having other subjects besides their main schedules, some believe that they should spend all their time and attention studying in order to get a qualification. This essay will discuss these two perspectives before concluding that I am in favour of the former.
On the one hand, some reasonable ideas are supporting the statement that university students should give their effort mostly in studying for a certification. First and foremost, It is vital for the students to understand well the whole concepts and definitions related to their majors. Such complex things will affect their work in the future so spending time focusing solely on major disciplines will assist the student to better learn those terms as they will not need to separate their time into smaller slots for other things. Furthermore, when the students do not waste their time on irrelevant courses, some of them can utilize their free time to dive deeper into research to explore useful scientific results which can help enhance human beings’ lives. For instance, healthcare students can take time to research new methods that cure mankind from diseases that still do not have medicines.
On the other hand, I fully agree with the idea that students should have chances to study supplementary subjects in addition to their main ones. By doing so, learners may broaden their understanding of other majors. This can help them to gain comprehensive knowledge of other kinds of jobs and increase their competitive advantages when going to work. Enter International University - VNUHCM in Vietnam. It can be seen that the students majoring in Marketing have opportunities to participate in financial workshops at the School of Economics and Finance. As a result, future marketers educated from this school have general views about finance which may somehow help them in the forthcoming days. Additionally, supplementary courses can be about soft skills that are extremely necessary for nowadays students. Growing up in the era of Information technology, children, these days, lack numerous types of soft skills, such as communication skills, problem-solving skills, etcetera. This will negatively impact their opportunities at the workplace.
In conclusion, there may be some mixed opinions related to whether students have both main courses and supplementary ones, I am convinced that it would be better for children to gain more knowledge of other fields rather than paying attention only to specific ones. By adopting a diverse understanding beyond their primary field of study, they may have more opportunities for their future careers and develop helpful soft skills, including critical thinking skills.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-05-07 Tường Vân 84 view
2024-03-21 MinyiChu 61 view
2024-03-21 MinyiChu 56 view
2024-03-18 minhnhat2002 73 view
2024-03-08 Nina Tsarevich 73 view
Essays by user minhnhat2002 :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, furthermore, if, may, regarding, so, still, well, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 7.85571142285 255% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 24.0651302605 187% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 60.0 41.998997996 143% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2431.0 1615.20841683 151% => OK
No of words: 451.0 315.596192385 143% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39024390244 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60833598836 4.20363070211 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87043944808 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 247.0 176.041082164 140% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547671840355 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 741.6 506.74238477 146% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.5673999775 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.947368421 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7368421053 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.10526315789 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.391166605919 0.244688304435 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112177173495 0.084324248473 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.081550739518 0.0667982634062 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.247281660976 0.151304729494 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0767297454426 0.056905535591 135% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 78.4519038076 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.