Some people work for the same organisation all their working life. Others think it is better to work for different organisations.
Nowadays, people have taken care of their career path more than in the past. Some people work for only one organisation for all their working life but others found it is better to work for many companies. Each opinion has its strengths and drawbacks.
To begin with the former, working in a company for a long time can show the loyalty of the employee. By this, they totally have lots of opportunities to get a higher position after earning enough experience and building relationships between colleagues. A recent survey showed that over 80% of senior staff can be arranged for higher positions due to the saving costs for training a newcomer. However, this kind of worker isn’t ready and hard to be adapted to another working way if there are any risks in their working process.
Another point is that working for some companies makes the employee does have a chance to face new working environments and different working styles so that they could find which one is suitable for their character. Almost all people in this group get their best development in their own way and get more experience for working life. But the drawback of the latter is that the recruiter is always looking for an employee who is willing to associate with their business.
In conclusion, I would choose to work for some companies in preference to contribute to a company for a whole life since they bring more advantages regarding to my experience and my benefit.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, regarding, so, in conclusion, kind of, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1207.0 1615.20841683 75% => OK
No of words: 250.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.828 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59846416177 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.58 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 369.0 506.74238477 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.3928672447 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.727272727 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7272727273 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.90909090909 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.539375642334 0.244688304435 220% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.196371393114 0.084324248473 233% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.19930856305 0.0667982634062 298% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.345807958318 0.151304729494 229% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.153896061573 0.056905535591 270% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 78.4519038076 65% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.