One long distance flight consumes fuel which a car uses in several years’ time, but they cause the same amount of pollution. So some people think that we should discourage non-essential flights such as tourist travel, rather than to limit the use of cars.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
The emissions from a long-haul airplane are comparable to those from a car over a few years; however, the flight consumes much more energy than a car. Therefore, it is argued that non-essential flights rather than automobile usage should be limited. Such idea is hardly plausible as people will be reluctant to forgo the benefits that both cars and airplanes offer to them.
it is undeniable that airplanes and automobiles have become the most popular modes of transport. Such enormous popularity has made possible due to the fact these two world-changing inventions have enabled humans to address two major problems regarding saving time and transporting heavy payloads over long distances. Hence, even though the two means of transport have been disrupting the balance of nature significantly through their use of natural resources, the advantages they have brought to humanity are substantial that it is a seemingly insurmountable challenge to curtail their usage. For example, were we forced to use trains instead of planes to travel abroad, it would definitely cost us a much greater amount of time for travelling, which would ultimately mean more days off and lost working time. Similar to how it would be hard to restrict the use of automobiles, especially light-duty trucks, as they are essential to an economy.
For these reasons, the focus should be shifted onto the use of renewable resources and environmentally-friendly designs. For the time being, this is probably the most viable solution to environmental problems as not only can we use automobiles and airplanes as much as we need, but also reduce their impacts on nature. In fact, governments across the world are providing incentives to automobile manufacturers who are investing in battery-powered cars running on solar energy so that these cars can be price-competitive and attracted to customers. Similarly, airplanes have been designed to be significantly fuel-efficient so as to decrease the release of nitrous oxide and particulate matter into the air. Obviously, such modifications to the two most common vehicles have not compromised our convenience while creating a smooth transition into a cleaner world.
In conclusion, restricting the use of non-essential flights and even cars is hardly possible as they are integral parts of our daily activities, and therefore, the best approach to environmental issues is to introduce green technologies and increase energy efficiency.
- Some people believe that young people should choose the jobs that they want but other people think they should be more realistic and think more about their future Discuss both views and give your own opinion 90
- Some countries allow old people to work to any age that they want Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 90
- In many countries people buy a range of household goods Is it a positive or negative development 89
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 80
- Each Year the Crime Rate Increases What Are the Causes of Crime and What Could Be Done to Prevent This Rise in Criminal Activity 92
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...th cars and airplanes offer to them. it is undeniable that airplanes and automo...
^^
Line 5, column 624, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...gned to be significantly fuel-efficient so as to decrease the release of nitrous oxide a...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, regarding, similarly, so, therefore, while, as to, for example, in conclusion, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 13.1623246493 175% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2080.0 1615.20841683 129% => OK
No of words: 385.0 315.596192385 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4025974026 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4296068528 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28687315942 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 176.041082164 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581818181818 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 665.1 506.74238477 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.5952184098 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.571428571 106.682146367 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5 20.7667163134 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.35714285714 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267948841628 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0856749683946 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0558120134216 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164771549962 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0508174529238 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 13.0946893788 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.77 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 78.4519038076 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.