Parent often give children everything they ask for and do what they like. Is it good for children? What are the consequences when they grow up?
Although these days almost parents worldwide claiming that they prefer to offer everything that their children request, I am in favour of the opinion that while it may be good in some situations, children should be limited by adults to avoid unexpected consequences when they become mature citizens.
There are good grounds for arguing that pampering is beneficial for building up happy families. The most persuasive argument is that family members may build strong relationships together through giving children food, toys, or time for playing. Small families, for example, not only may parents have more chances to communicate with their offspring, but they also may figure out kids’ habits and vocations. Another related issue is that if adults wish to comprehend the kids’ world, they need to offer what the kids ask for. Needless to say, this is particularly crucial for children offered enough physical goods to develop comprehensively.
Nevertheless, there is a myriad of strong arguments in favour of my stance for discouraging parents offering goods for kids due to certain demerits. This is because one extremely important principle is that when children satisfied whenever they request, they may lose the determination to gain successes. For children growing up in wealthy families with easy-going parents, it is apparent that children may not have core skills because they are used to receive everything simply without working to the bone. Last but not least, it is the responsibility of the parents to refuse unreasonable requests. As a result, it seems wrong for people to satisfy children unconditionally.
In view of these aforementioned discussions, I do accept that there are good reasons for giving goods for children, but my stance is that parents have to decide what to offer and refuse unappropriated requests because significant consequences are too dire to ignore.
- The table below shows the percentage of the population by age groups in one town who rode bicycles in 2011. 78
- Write a letter to your friend. You have borrowed something from your friend, and it got damaged.1. Apologise to the damage2. Explain what happened3. How you are going to fix the issue. 73
- Essay 5: Some people believe that famous people’s support towards international aid organisations draw attention to problems and contribute significantly for their achievements. Do you agree or disagree? 90
- Some people feel that paparazzi should not follow celebrities and invade their privacy by taking pictures of them everywhere, while others believe this is just the price of fame.Discuss both sides and give your opinion. Give reasons for your answer, and i 89
- Parent often give children everything they ask for and do what they like. Is it good for children? What are the consequences when they grow up? 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 446, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[5]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'used to receiving'.
Suggestion: used to receiving
...y not have core skills because they are used to receive everything simply without working to th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, nevertheless, so, while, for example, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1611.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38795986622 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99230004788 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581939799331 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 491.4 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.8381854752 49.4020404114 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.25 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9166666667 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.508291473441 0.244688304435 208% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.174656143415 0.084324248473 207% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0698244851512 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.307701407524 0.151304729494 203% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0426097051618 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.