Parents should encourage children to spend less time studying and more time doing physical activities. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Faced with the potential consequences from the heavy school workload, some parents suggest reducing their children’s pressure by getting their children to participate in more physical activities. From my perspective, however, I partially agree with this view.
On the one hand, it is noteworthy that encouraging children to exercise leads to many physical benefits. Scientific studies have shown that although it is invisible, devoting to education for academic achievements during juvenile stage is at the expense of normal physical growth due to the lack of time for
outdoor activities. Therefore, it will be a mistake to overlook the fact that children who give high commitment of time to education are inclined to adopt
sedentary lifestyle, which in turn may cause health problems, typically obesity and nearsightedness. This example is the illustration of the fact that if children spend more time exercising and participating in physical activities moderately, they can protect themselves from common health problems resulted from inactivity.
On the other hand, students need to spend time on study for the highly competitive pressure of education. According to sociological researches, the labor- intensive economy has gradually developed to knowledge-based economy, graduates from prestigious schools with outstanding academic qualifications are sought-after by employers and head-hunters, especially in fields with high level of specialization. In fact, the evaluation for university admission is largely based on academic performance as the prerequisite, and in most cases admission committees give little weight to student’s performances in sports. Therefore, spending more time on studies rather than sports is more recommended for most children.
In conclusion, there are many merits of doing physical activities, but for children, these benefits should not impact on their regular academic schooling.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-14 | Lombardi Florentina | 56 | view |
| 2023-03-01 | Namnef | 56 | view |
| 2022-10-21 | Charles Le | 78 | view |
| 2022-10-20 | Charles Le | 84 | view |
| 2022-10-20 | Charles Le | 78 | view |
- The map shows the change of Bell Hill from a farm in 1976 to an Environmental Study Centre in 2006 84
- Some people argue that holding sporting events is beneficial to countries development However other people hold the opposite opinion Discuss both views and give your own opinion 61
- The chart below shows the movement of people from rural to urban areas in three countries and predictions for future years 73
- Many animals are endangered Some people argue that we should only protect animals that are useful to humans To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- Some people argue that holding sporting events is beneficial to countries development However other people hold the opposite opinion Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, may, so, therefore, in conclusion, in fact, in most cases, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1647.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.88214285714 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28546388797 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632142857143 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 515.7 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 69.9316076754 49.4020404114 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.727272727 106.682146367 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4545454545 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.09090909091 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271628199218 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102691542755 0.084324248473 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0712305128138 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12632572658 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0225010685022 0.056905535591 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.0 13.0946893788 145% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 50.2224549098 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.12 12.4159519038 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.4 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.