People are consuming more and more sugar-based drink. Why? What can be done to reduce sugary drink consumption?
Ingredient for beverage is a thorny issue. That more and more sugar is employed as a method to creat attractive taste of drink is advocated by a host of people. In the meanwhile, others cling to perspective that it exerts deleterious impacts on our heath. My essay is going to analyze rationales why this trend become widely popular and what measures we take to diminish sugary consumption
Initially, drinking sweet beverage generates hormones engendering positive emotions. In particular, when pandemic drags on, some small business is going into hibernation mode that shoulder financial burden for both employers and staffs. When individuals are under great pressure, they often find something sweet to drink since it is a temporary method to relieve stress. As a result, they gradually become addicted to it. For instance, a person always takes drugs when being hurt will have a trend to use them in the next times; drinking sweet things is, too. When demand augments, not only manufactures but also small drinking stores add more and more sugar in beverages
Therefore, some steps are needed to taken to handle this issue. To solve it radically, each citizen should cut down an amount of sugar in their beverages. When demand declines, producers also reduce sugar to meet needs of public and survive in an intensely competitive market. The second solution is that government gives a policy which curbs sugar in bottled drink. For example, a bottle which is added much sugar will be more costly than one having no sugar inside. Last but not least, a healthy diet which uses less sugar daily should be widely promulgated in social platforms
In a nutshell, rationale of consuming sugary drink is that demand for them augments, especially when society puts great pressure in individuals. The best solutions are to decrease an amount of sugar consumped, give a policy restricting them and widely disseminate heathy lifestyle
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-13 | zhao_kangg | 89 | view |
| 2023-09-03 | Phuong1810 | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-12 | vuhungbo | 73 | view |
| 2022-09-27 | huy12345 | 56 | view |
| 2022-08-02 | trần thị như minh | 84 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 390, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s we take to diminish sugary consumption Initially, drinking sweet beverage gener...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, second, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in particular, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1615.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11075949367 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65571573583 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.620253164557 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 515.7 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.76362813 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.666666667 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0666666667 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.53333333333 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.29984947776 0.244688304435 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0868577585113 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0800466129262 0.0667982634062 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172346783311 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0438929003765 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.