People think that in the near future cars will be driven by computers, not people. Why? Do you think it is a positive or negative development?
Many hold a belief that people are inclined to give up cars driven by people and turn to automatic cars by computers because of the ever-changing world in contemporary society. This essay will present an overview of causes and in my view point, this phenomenon is more reasonable for the following reasons.
Firstly, the increasing pervasiveness of advanced technologies is widely perceived as the main reason. Many sociological studies have shown that although it is invisible, the popular conveniences of the state-of-the-art services towards time, work aspects are accompanied by the production of driverless vehicles. For example, Google, Apple and Tesla all have autonomous driving projects, with Tesla announcing that all of its vehicles will be self-driving within 5 years. Secondly, another factor that has added fuel to the fire is having all the functions of human motorists. Furthermore, the expansion of computer-driven cars is one of the contributive factors to become an ever-growing country.
In evaluating its impact, it is important to take potential effects on community and individuals into account. From a social perspective, the principal benefit of driving cars without people is the significant reduction of traffic jams and car accidents on the roads. Therefore, it will be a grave mistake to overlook the fact that human error or irresponsibility has resulted in the majority of accidents. According to researches, if the control of vehicles was computerised, the traffic would be safer for everyone, including cyclists and pedestrians. A second major advantage will be to expand the age of use. For the elderly or people with some physical disability or mental health problems like anxiety, a car driven by a software will be an beneficial application of leading-edge technology.
In conclusion, the development of modern devices and the replacement of human activities in controlling transportations is the main reason, which positively affects the future life as mentioned above.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-27 | tsln7607 | 61 | view |
| 2023-09-24 | tsln7607 | 79 | view |
| 2023-06-25 | AnnaAlysia | 61 | view |
| 2023-02-27 | thankforyourhelp | 61 | view |
| 2022-03-30 | creaam | 78 | view |
- Today food travels from thousands of miles from the farm to the consumer Some people say that it would be better for the economy environment if people ate food produced from local farmers Why is this the case Is it a positive development 84
- Some people argue that holding sporting events is beneficial to countries development However other people hold the opposite opinion Discuss both views and give your own opinion 61
- The world should have only one government rather than a national government for each country Do the advantages outweigh this advantage 61
- Some people argue that holding sporting events is beneficial to countries development However other people hold the opposite opinion Discuss both views and give your own opinion 61
- The chart below shows the expenditure on 3 categories with proportions among residents in the UK in 2004 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun hold seems to be countable; consider using: 'Many holds'.
Suggestion: Many holds
Many hold a belief that people are inclined to gi...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 745, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...ety, a car driven by a software will be an beneficial application of leading-edge ...
^^
Line 4, column 201, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cts the future life as mentioned above.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, look, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1700.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46623794212 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.31850245061 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617363344051 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 543.6 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.6802489307 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.428571429 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2142857143 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.21428571429 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233338240811 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0670494608822 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0649864242388 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127867764978 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0552973664334 0.056905535591 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.67 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 78.4519038076 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.