Public libraries should provide books and not waste their limited resources on expensive high tech media such as software videos or Dvds Do you agree or disagree

Essay topics:

Public libraries should provide books and not waste their limited resources on expensive high-tech media such as software, videos or Dvds. Do you agree or disagree?

Books are the most appropriate way to save the resources of public libraries, instead of wasting these scant resources on costly software, Dvds or videos. It is agreed that books have more values in many cultures, and also have an enormous effect psychologically in people life, otherwise those high-tech media that can be easily forgotten.

Reading from books is very useful in many and different cases as it can help to motivate our brain muscles to get the information, and remember it as it is a piece of cake. In addition, it also keeps your mind non-distracted, encouraging you to focus on what you are reading, minds will not go anywhere by those annoying adds or messages. Some people also added books can save our valuable resources and our old traditions, so we should keep them by heart.

Otherwise, books are not this expensive to make us to think for alternatives, and print fewer books. In contrary, shrinking number of books can lead to many debates, such as fighting to stop e-books to be published as a better alternative for the old traditional books, this fight can make us lose many books. So, we can avoid all these fights by just keep our tradition way as it is, just print books.

In a nutshell, Books has the most significant effect in all the sides of our life without any defects, that can cause any problem of loosing them or eradication. That’s why we have to take care of what we have, and don’t let anyone waste them haphazardly. Books have many pros that we have never thought about them before, so it is needed to stop all the campaigns that call to book contractions.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-08-02 tata 73 view
2023-08-01 tata 67 view
2023-08-01 tata 56 view
2023-08-01 tata 56 view
2023-08-01 tata 67 view
Essays by user tata :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, in addition, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 24.0651302605 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1330.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.68309859155 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6783996412 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.570422535211 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 412.2 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 36.9034926341 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.909090909 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8181818182 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.09090909091 7.06120827912 44% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158360020606 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0617103248958 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0489727654263 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102028102766 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0676826751151 0.056905535591 119% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 50.2224549098 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.16 12.4159519038 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 78.4519038076 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.