Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
There’s no doubt that in the modern World poorer countries dealing with a lot of problem than rich nations. While some people believes that, modern countries should prevent a lot of thinks also only financal support will be not enough for them , others argues that, the money can solve any problem and rich countries could focus their areas. In this essay, I will discuss both sides of the arguements and explain my support for the former view.
Nowadays, countries who have not enough money suffering more problems than others. For example, in these countries they can not access medical systems well and even when they are not suffering any bad disease, it can be still dangerous for them, such as flu because of their health systems. To solve this problems richer countries can help them. For instance, if rich nations prevent health than the countries who have not enough money will not suffer this problem anymore.
In other words, some people believe money can solve any problem. However, the experience of using money is so important like this situations. For instance, even if they reach the money, when they do not have any profession for any problem they will only lose money for nothing. Furthermore, the money does not provide experience, however experience does. If modern countries prevent a pathway for poorer nations, these countries could use this money effectively.
In conclusion, although money can solve some problems, however, in my opinion, money will not enough for poorer countries. The countries who have enough money, should prevent to poor nations professionals and pathways with money.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-04 | honguyenlily | 73 | view |
| 2023-11-29 | Alexanderpopov | 56 | view |
| 2023-11-02 | tracywu | 84 | view |
| 2023-10-31 | thaokim2003 | 89 | view |
| 2023-10-23 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 73, Rule ID: A_LOT_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun problem seems to be countable; consider using: 'a lot of problems'.
Suggestion: a lot of problems
...ern World poorer countries dealing with a lot of problem than rich nations. While some people be...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 244, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ncal support will be not enough for them , others argues that, the money can solve...
^^
Line 3, column 301, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...cause of their health systems. To solve this problems richer countries can help them...
^^^^
Line 5, column 126, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...nce of using money is so important like this situations. For instance, even if they ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, so, still, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, no doubt, such as, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 16.0 41.998997996 38% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1362.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13962264151 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40830483146 2.80592935109 86% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 176.041082164 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.509433962264 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 396.0 506.74238477 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.118557115 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.2857142857 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9285714286 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4285714286 7.06120827912 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256224780194 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11996539918 0.084324248473 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0758548756083 0.0667982634062 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187472137956 0.151304729494 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0164715112508 0.056905535591 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 78.4519038076 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.