Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In recent years, big countries increased their financial aid to small countries. A section of the society thought that money is not a solution for poor regions for the long term although instead of this rich countries give some long solution to solve poverty problems. I strongly believe that solution for big perspective gives some other technologies which solve generations poverty problems. In the course of the essay, I will describe arguments.
To begin with, aid is not a permanent solution for poor nations, rather aid those countries to give technical skills to people and also give some new innovation which increased their productivity. If people have skills to make things which able to sell in the international market to fulfil their requirements. For example, The USA gives some technology to African countries like how to make solar panels due to this in many areas they solve their electricity shortage after that they use this electricity to produce things on the production line.
Secondly, these countries help in the education system to develop and improve it. This education is able to create their future generation solve their poverty. For instance, if rich nation-build universities in the poor region that produce a new educated leader that solve their own problems. In addition, these educated people make a society without crime. people have jobs related to their skills then they get wages that reduce their financial problems and not do crimes.
In conclusion, money is not able to solve problems also not for long term however those countries give skills and education to natives which help for generations.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-04 | honguyenlily | 73 | view |
| 2023-11-29 | Alexanderpopov | 56 | view |
| 2023-11-02 | tracywu | 84 | view |
| 2023-10-31 | thaokim2003 | 89 | view |
| 2023-10-23 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
- We have been living in the nuclear age now for over half a century Since the first atomic bombs were developed nuclear technology has provided governments with the ability to totally destroy the planet Yet the technology has been put to positive use as an 67
- The diagrams below show the main reasons workers chose to work from home and the hours males and females worked at home for the year 2019 67
- Few people devote time to hobbies nowadays Say why you think this is the case and what effect this has on the individual and society in general 56
- In some countries owning a home rather than renting one is considered very important Why might this be the case Is this a positive or negative development 56
- Some people think that it is important to use leisure time for activities that improve the mind such as reading and doing word puzzles Other people feel that it is important to rest the mind during leisure time Discuss both views and give your own opinion 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 147, Rule ID: NEW_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'innovation'.
Suggestion: innovation
...cal skills to people and also give some new innovation which increased their productivity. If ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 198, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ion which increased their productivity. If people have skills to make things which...
^^
Line 2, column 332, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...their requirements. For example, The USA gives some technology to African countri...
^^
Line 3, column 360, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: People
...ed people make a society without crime. people have jobs related to their skills then ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1377.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 266.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17669172932 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69312823312 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 176.041082164 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.488721804511 0.561755894193 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 428.4 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.1363608135 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.923076923 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4615384615 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.84615384615 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258962006104 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0993632022863 0.084324248473 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0806773931179 0.0667982634062 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176895512945 0.151304729494 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0463668170646 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 78.4519038076 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.