Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to poor countries rather than financial support. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In the eyes of some, affluent countries should change their approach to helping less-developed counterparts with financial support since this aid packages have proven to be ineffective. I disagree with this belief as the root of poverty is the lack of money. Therefore, developed countries should maintain the financial support schemes with the addition of some required benchmarks.
The first fact to note is that affluent countries need to maintain their funding schemes for poorer countries since the deprivation of money is technically the root of ingrained poverty. In some countries, there are extremely poor people who cannot afford the cost of living. These people have to struggle with the formidable cost of basic needs in life and hardly have the opportunities to have the access to basic utilities, such as electricity or formal education. In these cases, the financial support from international aid packages may be their only hope to escape ingrained poverty. On the larger scale, low-income countries’ governments are incapable of providing enough financial aid packages to serve the demands of people. In fact, these governments are financially incapable of launching poverty eradication, such as creating jobs or women’s empowerment, due to the deprivation of money. Therefore, international support will help to reduce the pressure of money on poorer countries’ governments.
Furthermore, developed countries should maintain their financial aid package schemes with some additions of some required benchmarks to ensure the money will go to the hand of poor people. It is worth mentioning that many countries have some problems with corruption since their government systems are often rife with corrupted politicians, who are opportunists and use the national budget to enrich themselves. Therefore, affluent countries should monitor the use of aid packages of money to ensure to avoid issues like this and also to see the economic results countries receiving money achieving. This can guarantee the effectiveness of financial support schemes since data and solid evidence can reflect a country’s capability to leverage money into the people there to escape ingrained poverty.
In conclusion, developed countries should maintain their financial aid schemes and also base their decision on a country’s capability to efficiently use the international aid to eradicate poverty. With additional benchmarks, the use of aid packages can be cherished and improve the standard of living of the less-developed countries’ people.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-25 | viet@2002 | 95 | view |
| 2023-07-19 | quan12341234 | 56 | view |
| 2023-05-07 | ngandaqueen | 73 | view |
| 2023-05-07 | ngandaqueen | 73 | view |
| 2023-04-12 | cinderel | 61 | view |
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries but it does not solve poverty Therefore developed countries should give other types of help to poor countries rather than financial support To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people believe that culture would be ruined if it is used to earn tourism revenue but others consider that tourism is the only hope to protect a culture Discuss both sides and give your opinion 73
- Write an essay discussing two of the facilitie which facility should be given money from the local authority in your notes You should explain which facility it is more important for local authorities to give money to giving reasons in support of your answ 87
- Some people argue that mobile phones should be banned in public while other believe that the use of mobile phones is the basic rights of a human Discuss both views and give your opinion 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 341, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
... often rife with corrupted politicians, who are opportunists and use the national budge...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, if, may, so, therefore, in conclusion, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 41.998997996 157% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2166.0 1615.20841683 134% => OK
No of words: 386.0 315.596192385 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.61139896373 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43248042346 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08386800718 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.450777202073 0.561755894193 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 673.2 506.74238477 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.921257845 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.375 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.125 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0625 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.303409658758 0.244688304435 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12721980062 0.084324248473 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0712306959845 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.224282750066 0.151304729494 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0220048049641 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.