Rich countries often give money to poorer countries but it does not solve poverty Therefore developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid To what extent do you agree or disagree

Essay topics:

Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve
poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to the poor
countries rather than financial aid. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It is common for developed countries to give money to underdeveloped ones. However, financial aid itself is not enough to end poverty. Therefore, some people argue that other types of help should be given instead. This essay is to explain the reasons why I agree with this point of view.

First of all, education plays a crucial role in the development of a country, so one of the most effective ways to alleviate the poverty pressure is to promote education. It is uncontroversially true that well-educated human capital will lift a nation out of poverty. For that reason, wealthy countries can help lay the foundation of a sustainable, knowledge-based economy in impoverished countries by awarding scholarships to the talent.

In addition, solving the poverty puzzle requires dealing with environmental problems. A booming economy almost always coincides with pollution. Technology transfer is being conducted at the expense of the environment. Land, water, and air have been contaminated to the point of no return due to excessive industrial activities. Pollution-related illnesses lead to reduced workability, costly medical expenses will burden the healthcare system and deplete the national budget. Therefore, rich governments should help drive the transition to green technology in the third world. It will prevent industrialization from inflicting further damage on the ecosystem, thus improving public health and increasing labor productivity.

In conclusion, although money can relieve urgent, temporary difficulties, combating poverty is a long-term process. That underlines the need of more sustainable assistance to third-world nations.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-01-04 honguyenlily 73 view
2023-11-29 Alexanderpopov 56 view
2023-11-02 tracywu 84 view
2023-10-31 thaokim2003 89 view
2023-10-23 Giang Tran 73 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 305, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the point of no return due to excessive industrial activities. Pollution-related...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, so, therefore, third, thus, well, in addition, in conclusion, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1415.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 246.0 315.596192385 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.75203252033 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.38944688532 2.80592935109 121% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.686991869919 0.561755894193 122% => OK
syllable_count: 440.1 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.4142829121 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.4375 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.375 20.7667163134 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.875 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208439538515 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0547493050434 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0777846760014 0.0667982634062 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114864342557 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0852576832502 0.056905535591 150% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.33 50.2224549098 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.48 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.48 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 305, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the point of no return due to excessive industrial activities. Pollution-related...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, so, therefore, third, thus, well, in addition, in conclusion, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1415.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 246.0 315.596192385 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.75203252033 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.38944688532 2.80592935109 121% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.686991869919 0.561755894193 122% => OK
syllable_count: 440.1 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.4142829121 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.4375 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.375 20.7667163134 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.875 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208439538515 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0547493050434 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0777846760014 0.0667982634062 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114864342557 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0852576832502 0.056905535591 150% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.33 50.2224549098 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.48 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.48 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.