For school children, their teachers have more influence on their intelligence and social development than their parents. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
As academic learning and vocational training are crucial to the maturity of a child, it is often to see others think teachers’ roles outweigh parents when it comes to this topic. It’s can’t be denied that the influence of teachers is beneficial in the sense of transferring socializing skills and knowledge, but I believe there is more reason why parents have more impact on their kids.
To be honest, some people prefer teachers to parents when it comes to teaching children about matters in life and improving their critical thinking. It is understandable mainly because tutors provide knowledge, giving information, therefore contributing a big part to children’s intelligence and their social skills. With the teacher’s guidance, children can have more skills, for example, they can learn how to gather data smartly as well as keep themself updated with social news.
However, parents have more influence on their children when it comes to raising and personalities’ understanding. As a parent, recognizing talents and children's potential can be earlier than anybody, for that they can pay attention and invest more on and maximize their intelligence. Sports, for example, many children have potential in sports from an early age and without parent’s attention, that talent can be wasted. While teachers teach children subjects such as math, physic, chemist, parents teach them life skills such as car fixing, cooking. Not only that, parents play a big role in children’s manner, teaching them how to act when you are in public, mentor them the basic skill of a human. When children behave badly, parents are said to have failed to educate them.
For all of the reasons above, I can strengthen my beliefs that mentors don’t have more impact on children than parents do.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-31 | chips_0506 | 87 | view |
| 2022-10-31 | phuongchi17899 | 61 | view |
| 2022-08-02 | doquytuan | 61 | view |
| 2022-08-02 | doquytuan | 56 | view |
| 2022-02-21 | phuongchi17899 | 61 | view |
- In many workplaces online communication is now more common than face to face meetings Do the advantages of this trend outweigh the disadvantages 78
- The Internet will never replace traditional course books in schools How far do you agree with this prediction 84
- The three pie charts show different accommodation choices by holidaymakers in the three years 1965 1985 and 2005 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making relevant comparisons 61
- When students move to a new school they sometimes face problems How can schools help these students with their problems Use specific reasons and examples to explain your answer 56
- 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 5, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
... to have failed to educate them. For all of the reasons above, I can strengthen my beli...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, then, therefore, well, while, for example, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1516.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24567474048 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80418179567 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.57785467128 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 442.8 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.6091712021 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.333333333 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0833333333 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.373089896907 0.244688304435 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.151304613148 0.084324248473 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0781771104183 0.0667982634062 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.23865792238 0.151304729494 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0295831105369 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.