Social networks have brought our life only benefits. Agree or disagree?
In this modern era, with the development of technology, the internet has become more and more prevalent. This leads to the appearance of social media being ubiquitous. It is said that this situation only causes beneficial effects. I equally agree and disagree with this statement and this essay will analyze the reasons.
On the one hand, people can not deny that social networks play an important role in daily life. First of all, it is a source to acquire information. It can be explained that with the improvement of digital technology, the government not only updates news in traditional ways such as newspapers, radio, and others but also posts on social media. For instance, some Facebook accounts that have been authenticated, especially state agencies' accounts, are reliable sources for updating current news situations. Moreover, social media is also an effective assistant tool for making relationships as well as keeping contact with friends all over the world. To illustrate, creating a Twitter account can have users connect to everyone who is using these platforms without face-to-face meeting.
On the other hand, the underlying consequences of using media networks are much more concerning. Initially, the addiction to the internet is a warning signal. The percentage of people who own personal smart devices increases annually. According to research in 2019, nearly 40 percent of survey participants spend more than 180 minutes per day using smartphones to surf social media platforms such as TikTok, Facebook and Instagram. These actions have a significant influence on users' health, both physical and mental. Furthermore, the privacy policy of social networks is still not completely strict. Scamming is a point of case. Crime tend to take advantage of vulnerabilities in the security policies of some social networking sites, defrauding and stealing user’s information.
In conclusion, besides the enormous merits of social media, people have to provide solutions for its demerits. If social networks are being used reasonably, it will play an essential role in the improvement of a country.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-31 | trpg143 | view | |
| 2024-07-31 | trpg143 | view | |
| 2024-03-18 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 84 | view |
| 2024-03-10 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2024-02-24 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
- Although families have powerful influence on children the influence that comes from outside the family plays a bigger part in children s development To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people believe that young people should spend their free time with family rather than go to entertainment activities outside the house Some disagree Discuss both views and give your own opinion 61
- Some believe that the Olympic games help bring people from different nations together while others claim that holding the Olympics wastes money which could be used for important issues Discuss both sides and give your own opinion Space travel has been pos 56
- Space travel has been possible for some time and some people say that space tourism will be developed in the future What do you think space travel is positive or negative a development 56
- Social networks have brought our life only benefits Agree or disagree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 479, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'users'' or 'user's'?
Suggestion: users'; user's
...actions have a significant influence on users health, both physical and mental. Furt...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, furthermore, if, moreover, so, still, then, well, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1794.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 331.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41993957704 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95064873912 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601208459215 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 557.1 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.084892148 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.7 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.55 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.9 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213082563045 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0561711885639 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0441463728329 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122414202656 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0177653705567 0.056905535591 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.86 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.68 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.