The society would benefit from a ban on all forms of advertising because it serves no useful purpose, and can even be damaging.
Do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, there are widely differing schools of thought on the issue of whether advertisements should be forbidden for the sake of residents. From my personal perspective, I am opposed to the aforementioned view due to ample justifications
Regarding benefits for individuals, promotional activities can enable them to gain insight into goods being available on the market and making wise decisions. Numerous products with special features which can enhance our living standard are made every day. However, if marketing does not make attempts to provide their potential customer with information about products, consumers will have difficulties in finding suitable things. For instance, online advertisements make it more convenient for students to find laptops or other modern devices that not only are appropriate with their budget and demand, but also catch up with the latest technology. In addition, marketing activities create opportunities for cútomers to make a comparison between products from different companies; thus, they can have superior purchase choices.
In terms of general public advantages, imposing strict prohibition on advertisements may deter society from developing. It cannot be denied that profit from media enterprises significantly contribute to national budgets. Hence, banning adverts could put pressure on governments to make up for the lost money that has the ability to tackle lots of social issues . Moreover, the advertising industry can elevate people out of joblessness; therefore, enacting such regulation can increase unemployment rates. This can lead to instability in our community since dwellers carry out illegal activities that can help them make ends meet.
In summary, the negative impacts of advertising are negligible compared to the merits; thus, the state should create opportunities for it to prosper.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-12 | anhduonggnee.e | view | |
| 2023-08-18 | tdat2709 | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-18 | giaminhonha | 56 | view |
| 2023-08-18 | trikhung777 | 84 | view |
| 2023-05-06 | vuhungbo | 84 | view |
- The society would benefit from a ban on all forms of advertising because it serves no useful purpose and can even be damaging Do you agree or disagree 61
- Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since computer technology is now replacing their functions To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 92
- Some people believe that it is more important to teach children the literature of their own country than other countries Do you agree or disagree 78
- The society would benefit from a ban on all forms of advertising because it serves no useful purpose and can even be damaging Do you agree or disagree 61
- Some people say that economic growth is the only way to end hunger and poverty while others say that economic growth is damaging the environment so it must be stopped Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 13, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...superior purchase choices. In terms of general public advantages, imposing strict prohibition...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 360, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... ability to tackle lots of social issues . Moreover, the advertising industry can ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, may, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, thus, well, for instance, in addition, in summary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1584.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.76 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10376792646 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.698181818182 0.561755894193 124% => OK
syllable_count: 498.6 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.205933116 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.0 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9166666667 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0833333333 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138679514573 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0517991141221 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0297069212269 0.0667982634062 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.078313970738 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0416511257016 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.42 12.4159519038 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.64 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.